206 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRA-D-135-2026 DECIDED ON:10.06.2026 ARPANDEEP SINGH .....APPELLANT VS. STATE OF PUNJAB .....RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE SANDEEP MOUDGIL CORAM: HON’BLE MS.JUSTICE RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL Present: Ms. Chandanpreet Kaur Ahluwalia, Advocate for the appellant Mr. Satnam Preet Singh Chauhan, DAG Punjab SANDEEP MOUDGIL , J. The present appeal Appeal U/s 21 of National Investigation Agency Act, 2008 has been preferred against the impugned order dated 29.12.2025 passed by Ld. Additional Sessions Judge, Gurdaspur whereby regular bail filed by the appellant in case bearing F.I.R. No. 124 dated 19.12.2024 under Sections 109, 324 (4), 303 (2), 317 (2), 341 (2), 61 (2) BNS, 2023, 4/5 Explosive Substance Act, 1884, later on added Section 13, 16, 17, 18-B, 20, 35, 40, 43E UAPA Act, Section 3/4/5 explosive substance Act, 1908, Police Station Kalanaur, District Gurdaspur, has been dismissed. Learned State counsel has produced the custody certificate of the appellant, which is taken on record. Status report filed by way of an affidavit of Amolak Singh, PPS, Deputy Superintendent of Police, Sub Division Kalanaur, District Gurdaspur, is taken on record. MEENU 2026.06.11 16:34 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRA-D-135-2026 -2- After arguing for some time, learned counsel for the appellant prays for withdrawal of the present petition at this stage. Prayer is accepted. Dismissed as withdrawn at this stage. (SANDEEP MOUDGIL) JUDGE (RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL) JUDGE 10.06.2026 Meenu 1. Whether speaking/reasoned? Yes/No 2. Whether reportable? Yes/No MEENU 2026.06.11 16:34 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document