Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 24014 (KAR)

VENKATESH BABU v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/19033/2026 · 2026-06-24

E S Indiresh

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:31377 WP No. 19033 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 24TH DAY OF JUNE, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH WRIT PETITION NO. 19033 OF 2026 (LR) BETWEEN: 1. VENKATESH BABU S/O. SRI.S.N.HANUMANTARAO AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS. 2. C.S.NARAYANAMURTHY S/O. N.SUBBARAO AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS 3. C.S.KRISHNAMURTHY S/O. N.SUBBARAO AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS 4. C.S.SHIVAKUMAR S/O. N.SUBBARAO AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS ALL ARE R/AT CHANDRAHALLI CHINTAMANI TALUK CHIKKABALLAPUR DISTRICT-563125. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. RAJESWARA.P.N., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REP. BY ITS SECRETARY REVENUE DEPARTMENT ROOM NO.627, 6TH FLOOR 1ST GATE, MS BUILDING BENGALURU-560001. 2. THE LAND TRIBUNAL CHINTAMANI TALUK Digitally signed by CHAYA S A Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:31377 WP No. 19033 of 2026 CHIKKABALAPUR DISTRICT-563125 BY ITS SECRETARY. 3. KENDANAHALLI MUNIAPPA S/O. ERAPPA VADDARAHALLI CHINTAMANI TALUK CHIKKABALLAPUR DISTRICT-563125. S.N.HANUMANTARAO SINCE DEAD BY LR. 4. K.S.RAMACHANDRAPPA AGED MAJOR KONAPALLI VILLAGE AMBAJI DURGA HOBLI CHIKKABALLAPUR DISTRICT-563125. 5. MUNINARAYANAPPA S/O. LATE BENGALURU KEMPANNA AGED MAJOR 6. MUNIYAPPA S/O. LATE CHENNARAYAPPA AGED MAJOR 7. B.KRISHNAPPA S/O. LATE BACHAPPA AGED MAJOR 8. ASWATHAREDDY AND BAYANNA S/O. NARAYANAREDDY AGED MAJOR. 9. NARAYASWAMY S/O. KRISHNAPPA AGED MAJOR. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:31377 WP No. 19033 of 2026 10. CHENNAPPA S/O. AMITIGANAHALLI BYRAPPA AGED MAJOR. 11. KRISHNAPPA S/O. LATE NARAYANAPPA AGED MAJOR 12. NARAYANASWAMY S/O BACHAPPA AGED MAJOR R4 TO R12 ARE R/AT B.VADDAHALLI VILLAGE AMBAJIDURGA HOBLI, CHINTAMANI TALUK CHIKKABALLAPUR-563125. …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. B P RADHA, AGA FOR R1 TO R2) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT RESPONDENT NO. 2 TO COMPLY WITH THE ORDER, DATED 02.04.2012 IN WP.NO.10129/2003 (ANNEXURE-G) IN SO FAR AS THE PROCEEDINGS IN LRM.997/74-75 WITHIN THREE FROM THE DATE OF DISPOSAL OF THIS WRIT PETITION BY CORRECTING THE PROCEEDINGS UNDER LRM.CR/61,62,63,64,65,66, 67,68/2001-02 ANNEXURE-A ON THE FILE OF THE RESPONDENT NO.2 AS PROCEEDINGS UNDER LRM.997/74-75 VIDE ANNEXURE E AND ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:31377 WP No. 19033 of 2026 ORAL ORDER 1. Learned AGA accepts notice for respondent Nos.1 and 2. 2. In this writ petition, the petitioners have sought for writ of mandamus on respondent No.2 to comply with the order dated 02.04.2012 in W.P.No.10129/2003 (Annexure-G) insofar as the proceedings in LRM.997/74- 75. 3. Having taken note of the submissions made by the learned counsel appearing for the parties, this Court, by order dated 02.04.2012 in W.P.No.10129/2003 (Annexure-G), remanded the matter to the Land Tribunal for fresh consideration in the matter. 4. In that view of the matter, I am of the view that respondent No.2 is directed to comply with the order passed by this Court dated 02.04.2012 in W.P.No.10129/2003 (Annexure-G) in respect of - 5 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:31377 WP No. 19033 of 2026 LRM No.997/74-75, within a period of eight months from the date of receipt of copy of this order. 5. It is also made clear that, the notice of which has been issued to the petitioner herein at Annexure-H is not pertaining to the subject land in W.P.No.10129/2003. 6. With this observation, the writ petition is disposed of. SD/- (E.S.INDIRESH) JUDGE HA LIST NO.: 1 SL NO.: 44