APHC010465112025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3233] THURSDAY,THE TWENTY NINETH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B KRISHNA MOHAN WRIT PETITION NO: 23546/2025 Between: 1. NANGI NARAYANA REDDY, S/O. PARAMESWARA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS, R/O. YARRASANIVARI PALLE, TALUPULA MANDAL, ANATHAPURAMU DISTRICT. 2. CHENNAPU CHENNA REDDY,, S/O. CHENNA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS, R/O.CHINNA GURAVALURU, CHAPADU MANDAL, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. THE STATE OF AP, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, KADAPA, Y.S.R KADAPA DISTRICT. 3. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, KADAPA, Y.S.R KADAPA DISTRICT. 4. THE TAHSILDAR, C.K.DINNE MANDAL, Y.S.R KADAPA DISTRICT. 5. THE VILLAGE REVENUE OFFICER, MAMILLAPALLI VILLAGE, C.K.DINNE MANDAL, Y.S.R KADAPA DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue a WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the action of the Respondents herein particularly Respondent No.2 in not considering the 2 Petitioners Application vide Application ID.No.TATTAO 12500131159, Dt. 16.06.2025 for deletion of the Petitioners property to an extent of Ac.0.35 cents in Sy.No.703/IB of Mamillapalli Village, C.K.Dinne Mandal, YSR Kadapa District from the Prohibited Properties list notified under Section 22-A of The Registration Act, 1908 is questioned as the same is arbitrary, illegal, contrary being violative of fundamental and constitutional rights guaranteed under articles 14, 19, 21 and 300-A of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the Respondent No.2 to delete the subject property from the Prohibited Properties List notified under Section 22-A of The Registration Act, 1908 in respect of the petitioners Application vide Application ID.No.TATTAO 12500131159, Dt. 16.06.202524 and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to DIRECT the Respondent No.2 to delete the subject property i.e., an extent of Ac.0.35 cents in Sy.No.703/ IB of Mamillapalli Village, C.K.Dinne Mandal, YSR Kadapa District, from the Prohibited Properties List notified under Section 22-A of The Registration Act, 1908 in respect of the petitioner’s Application vide Application ID.NO.TATTA012500131159, Dt. 16.06.202524, pending disposal of the Writ petition before this Hon’ble court, and pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. SURESH KUMAR REDDY KALAVA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR REVENUE 3 The Court made the following ORDER: Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned Assistant Government Pleader appearing for the respondents. 2. This Writ Petition was filed declaring the action of the respondents particularly the 2nd respondent in not considering the petitioners’ application vide Application ID.No.TATTA012500131159, dated 16.06.2025 for deletion of the petitioners’ property to an extent of Ac.0.35 cents in Sy.No.703/IB of Mamillapalli Village, C.K.Dinne Mandal, YSR Kadapa District from the Prohibited Properties List notified under Section 22-A of The Registration Act, 1908. 3. On the other hand, in spite of giving sufficient time to get instructions on 04.09.2025 and 22.01.2026, the learned Assistant Government Pleader is unable to secure the same. 4. However, the learned counsel for the petitioners submits that on verification, it is found that the said application is still pending before the 2nd respondent. 5. In view of the above said facts and circumstances, the 2nd respondent is directed to consider and dispose of the petitioners’ application vide ID.No.TATTA012500131159, dated 16.06.2025, if not already disposed of, strictly in accordance with law by hearing all the parties concerned including the petitioners, giving due opportunity, upon verification of the records and the subject land, appropriate decision shall be taken on its own merits, as 4 expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of three (03) months from the date of receipt of copy of this Order. 6. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. Interim order, if any, deemed to have been vacated. As a sequel, Interlocutory Applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________ JUSTICE B KRISHNA MOHAN 29.01.2026 SCH 5 372 THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE B. KRISHNA MOHAN W.P.No.23546 of 2025 Date: 29.01.2026 SCH