Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 24012 (CHH)

SMT. ANITA CHANDRA v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPHC/20/2026 · 2026-06-30

Shri Ravindra Kumar Agrawal

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2026:CGHC:26820-DB NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPHC No. 20 of 2026 Smt. Anita Chandra W/o Late Pawan Kumar Chandra, Aged About 37 Years R/o Village Achritpali, P.S. Malkharoda, District- Sakti (C.G.) ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Its Secretary, Department Of Home, Mahanadi Bhavan, New Raipur (C.G.) 2 - Superintendent Of Police, Sakti, District- Sakti (C.G.) 3 - Station House Officer, Police Station Malkharoda, District- Sakti (C.G.) 4 - Sukhlal Yadav S/o Awadhram Yadaw Aged About 18 Years R/o Village Achritpali, P.S. Malkharoda, District-Sakti (C.G.) 5 - Ravi Yadav S/o Bisahu Yadav Aged About 18 Years R/o Village Achritpali, P.S. Malkharoda, District- Sakti (C.G.) ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Mr.Tapan Kumar Chandra, Advocate For Respondents No.1 to 3/State : Mr.Priyank Rathi, Government Advocate Hon'ble Shri Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Hon'ble Shri Ravindra Kumar Agrawal , Judge Order on Board Per Ramesh Sinha , Chief Justice 01 .07 .2026 1. Heard Mr.Tapan Kumar Chandra, learned counsel for the petitioner BABLU RAJENDRA BHANARKAR Digitally signed by BABLU RAJENDRA BHANARKAR Date: 2026.07.01 17:50:28 +0530 2 as well as Mr.Priyank Rathi, learned Government Advocate appearing for respondents No.1 to 3/State. 2. The present writ petition has been filed by the petitioner with the following prayers: “10.1. That, this Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to allow this petition and issue a writ in the nature of habeas corpus and the respondent police authorities may be directed to search and produce the corpus before this Hon’ble Court, in the interest of justice. 10.2. That, this Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to allow this petition and grant custody of minor girl to the petitioner, who is her natural guardian, in the interest of justice. 10.3 Any other relief/order may also be granted that may be deemed fit and just in the facts and circumstances of the case.” 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this petition with liberty to take recourse to law as the FIR has already been registered. 4. Permission is granted. 5. Accordingly, the present writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty, as prayed for. Sd/- Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) (Ramesh Sinha) Judge Chief Justice Bablu