1 2026:CGHC:26473 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 3178 of 2026 1 - Shyam Kashyap S/o Shri Shambhu Prasad Kashyap Aged About 66 Years R/o Ward No.40, Nirala Nagar, Infront Of Raja Hostel Old Bus Stand Bilaspur District- Bilaspur (C.G.) ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary Urban Administration Urban And Development Department Mahanadi Bhawan Atal Nagar, Naya Raipur District- Raipur (C.G.) 2 - Collector Bilaspur District- Bilaspur (C.G.) 3 - Commissioner Municipal Corporation Bilaspur District- Bilaspur (C.G.) 4 - Building Officer Municipal Corporation Bilaspur District- Bilaspur (C.G.) 5 - Shirish Pandey S/o Lt. Shri S.P. Pandey 6 - Aashish Pandey S/o Lt Shri S.P. Pandey 7 - Girish Pandey S/o Lt. Shri S.P. Pandey. Respondent Nos. 5 to 7 R/o Nirala Nagar Infront Of Raja Hotel Old Bus Stand Bilaspur District- Bilaspur (C.G.) ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Shri Abdul Wahab Khan and Shri Abdul Moin Khan, Advocates. For State : Shri RK Gupta, Addl AG. For Respondent Nos. 3& 4 : Shri Pranjal Shukla, Advocate. Hon’ble Mr. Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad Order on Board 30/06/2026 AVINASH SHARMA Digitally signed by AVINASH SHARMA Date: 2026.07.01 10:27:06 +0530 2 1. This Writ Petition has been filed for the following reliefs:- 10.1. That, the Hon'ble Court my kindly be pleased to direct the respondent authority to consider and decide the representation (Annexure P1) filed by the petitioner. 10.2. That, the Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased direct the respondent authority to take appropriate action against the respondent no. 5 to 7 for remove of illegal encroachment from the government land / road. based on the prescribed map as per rules. 10.3. Any other relief or reliefs may also be granted to the petitioners which this Hon'ble court deems fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the respondent No.5 to 7 have encroached over government land and the concerned revenue authorities, who are responsible to remove the encroachment, are not taking any action despite representation submitted by the petitioner. 3. Considering the nature of dispute, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents No.1, 2 and 3 to enquire the matter and if the respondents No. 5 to 7 or any other person is found to have encroached government land, appropriate proceedings be initiated for removal of encroachment. 4. In view of the above observations/directions, this petition is disposed of. Sd/- (Amitendra Kishore Prasad) Judge Avinash