APHC010464192025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3459] MONDAY, THE FIFTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM CONTEMPT CASE NO: 2511/2025 Between: 1. RAPAKA UDAYA BHASKARA RAO, S/O LATE SURANNA, AGED ABOUT 67 YEARS, OCC CONTRACTOR, R/O DOOR NO 2-152, ATTHILI VILLAGE AND MANDAL, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 2. SRI K BULLEYYA, S/O SATYANARAYANA, AGED ABOUT 67 YEARS, OCC CONTRACTOR, R/O D NO 12-8-10, GUNUPUDI, SOMAGUNDHAM NORTH, BHEEMAVARARN, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. G SAI PRASAD, SPECIAL CHIEF SECRETARY, WATER RESUORCE DEPARTMENT, SECRETRIATE BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. SRI PEEYUSH KUMAR, PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, FINANCE AND PLANNING DEPARTMENT, SECRETRIATE BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 3. SRI K NARASIMHA MURTHY, THE ENGINEER IN CHIEF, IRRIGATION DEPARTMENT, 27-20-44, MUSEUEM ROAD, VENKATESHWARA RAO STREET, GOVERNORPETA, VIJAYAWADA. 4. SMT C NAGA RANI, THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT, WEST GODAVARI AT BHIMAVARAM. . 5. SRI CH DEVA PRAKASH, THE SUPERINTENDENT ENGINEER, 2 IRRIGATION CIRCLE, ELURU 6. SRI CH WS SATYANARAYANA INCHARGE, THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, G.W DIVISION, NIDDAVOLE, WEST GODAVARI. 7. 7. SRI CH WS SATYANARAYANA, THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, DRAINAGE DIVISION, BHIMAVARAM, WEST GODAVARI. ...CONTEMNOR(S): Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to pleased punish the contemnors/respondents under the provisions of contempt of courts Act for wilfully disobeying the orders of Honble Court passed in W.P No. 28011 of 2024, Dt. 17-04-2025, and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. A.SREE RAM Counsel for the Contemnor(S): 1. VENKATA SAI KRISHNA PONNURU 3 The Court made the following ORDER: Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the order passed by this Court has been complied with by the respondents. Hence, no further orders are required in the contempt case. Recording the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioners, the Contempt Case is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________________ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM Dated: 05.01.2026 KAS 4 27 THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM CONTEMPT CASE NO: 2511/2025 Dated: 05.01.2026 KAS