Smt. P.Sampoorna, E.517560, Conductor, W/o P.Venkateswarlu v. The APSRTC., rep.by its Managing Director, Pandit Nehru
WP/21361/2017 · 2026-02-11
Maheswara Rao Kuncheam
Review Petitionbody2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 24003 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 24003 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010468322017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3504] THURSDAY, THE TWELFTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM WRIT PETITION NO: 21361/2017 Between:
1. SMT. P.SAMPOORNA, E.517560, CONDUCTOR, W/O P.VENKATESWARLU,, R/O NAGAVOLU VILLAGE, PALUGODU POST, DAKKILI MANDAL, NELLORE DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND
1. THE APSRTC REP BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR PANDIT NEHRU, BUS STATION, RTC HOUSE, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT, A.P.
2. THE REGIONAL MANAGER A P S R T C NELLORE REGION, NELLORE, NELLORE DISTRICT. 3. THE DY CHIEF TRAFFIC MANAGER APSRTC NELLORE NELLORE, DISTRICT. 4. THE DEPOT MANAGER APSRTC RAPUR DEPOT RAPUR NELLORE, DIST. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to to issue a writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the 2nd respondent in not issuing the Posting Orders (Re-engagement in to service orders) to the petitioner in pursuance of the proceedings dt.29-08-2016 issued by the appellate authority i.e., 3rd respondent herein is illegal, arbitrary and violation of Art.21 of the Constitution of India, 1950 and violation of principles of Natural Justice, consequently direct the 2nd respondent to dispose off the Review Petition filed by the petitioner dt.07-11-2016 IA NO: 1 OF 2017(WVMP 5152 OF 2017
2
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to vacate the interim order dated 13-07-2017 W.P.M.P.No.26266 of 2017 in W.P.No_21.361 of 2017 and pass IA NO: 2 OF 2017(WPMP 26266 OF 2017 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 2nd respondent herein to issue posting orders to the petitioner in pursuance of the proceedings dt.29-08-2016 issued by the appellate authority i.e., 3rd respondent herein in the light of the Joining Report submitted by the petitioner dt.08-09-2016, pending disposal of the Writ Petition, Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. S A K MYNUDDIN Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1.
P DURGA PRASAD SC FOR APSRTC The court made the following ORDER:-
The writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking the following main prayer:
“…..to issue a writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the 2nd respondent in not issuing the Posting Orders (Re- engagement in to service orders) to the petitioner in pursuance of the proceedings dt.29-08-2016 issued by the appellate authority i.e., 3rd respondent herein is illegal, arbitrary and violation of Art.21 of the Constitution of India, 1950 and violation of principles of Natural Justice, consequently direct the 2nd respondent to dispose of the Review Petition filed by the petitioner dt.07-11-2016…..”
2. The conspectus of the writ petition is with regard to non-issuance of posting (re-engagement) orders to the petitioner in pursuance with the proceedings dated 29.08.2016 issued by the 3rd respondent appellate authority i.e., Deputy Chief Traffic Manager, APSRTC, Nellore. 3
3. At the time of considering the matter, Sri Aravala Rama Rao, learned Standing Counsel for respondent Corporation, while placing a copy of proceedings dated 22.07.2017 of the Personnel Officer, APSRTC, Nellore, submits that pursuant to the interim orders dated 12.07.2017 of this Court, the petitioner was re-engaged into service as afresh contract conductor and posted at Vakadu Depot. He submits that the cause in the writ petition does not survive. 4. Sri Challagali Gopalraju, learned counsel attached to the office of Sri MAK Mynuddin, learned counsel for the petitioner, has not disputed the re- engagement of the petitioner into service. 5. In view of the submission that the petitioner re-engaged into service through the proceedings of the Personnel Officer, APSRTC, Nellore, this Court is of the opinion that no further orders are required in the lis as the grievance of the petitioner has already been redressed. Accordingly, the writ petition is closed. 6. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, all pending applications shall stand closed. _______________________________ JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM Date: 12.02.2026 GVK
4
79
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM
WRIT PETITION No.21361 of 2017
Date: 12.02.2026
GVK