Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 23999 (CHH)

KHOJHAN PRASAD CHANDRA v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

CRMP/574/2026 · 2026-06-29

Shri Ravindra Kumar Agrawal

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2026:CGHC:26563-DB NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRMP No. 574 of 2026 1 - Khojhan Prasad Chandra S/o Dau Lal Aged About 36 Years Gram Belha, P.S. Bilaigarh, Tahsil Bilaigarh, District Sarangarh Bilaigarh C.G. 2 - Charan Lal S/o Babulal Aged About 36 Years Gram Belha, P.S. Bilaigarh, Tahsil Bilaigarh, District Sarangarh Bilaigarh C.G. 3 - Ganeshwar Chandra S/o Nirmal Chandra Aged About 22 Years Gram Belha, P.S. Bilaigarh, Tahsil Bilaigarh, District Sarangarh Bilaigarh C.G. 4 - Uttam Chandra S/o Vijay Chandra Aged About 20 Years R/o Gram Sukda, P.S. Dabhra, District Sakti C.G. 5 - Ghasnin Bai Chandra W/o Gangaram Chandra Aged About 40 Years R/o Gram Devraha, P.S. Bhatgaon, District Sarangarh-Bilaigarh C.G. 6 - Ahilya Bai Chandra W/o Late Daulal Chandra Aged About 65 Years Gram Belha, P.S. Bilaigarh, Tahsil Bilaigarh, District Sarangarh Bilaigarh C.G. 7 - Krishna Gobind Chandra S/o Daul Lal Chandra Aged About 45 Years Gram Belha, P.S. Bilaigarh, Tahsil Bilaigarh, District Sarangarh Bilaigarh C.G. ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary Home Department Chhattisgarh. 2 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through S.H.O. Police Station Bilaigarh, District Sarangarh-Bilaigarh C.G. 2 3 - Laxmin W/o Badal Ravidas Aged About 25 Years Gram Belha, P.S. Bilaigarh, Tahsil Bilaigarh, District Sarangarh Bilaigarh C.G. ... Respondent(s) (cause title taken from CIS) For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Awadh Tripathi, Advocate For State For Respondent No. 3 : : Mr. Sourabh Sahu, Panel Lawyer Mr. Sachin Nidhi, Advocate Hon'ble Shri Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Hon'ble Shri Ravindra Kumar Agrawal, Judge Order on Board Per Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice 30/06/2025 1. Heard Mr. Awadh Tripathi, learned counsel for the petitioners. Also heard Mr. Sourabh Sahu, learned Panel Lawyer, appearing for the Respondent No. 1 and 2/State and Mr. Sachin Nidhi, learned counsel for Respondent No. 3. 2. The present CrMP has been filed by the petitioners with the following relief: "a) The Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to quash the FIR no. 322/2025 dated 15.12.2025 registered at the police station of Bilaigarh District Sarangarh Bilaigarh (C.G.), under section 115 (2), 191(2), 296, 333, 351(2) BNS and section 3 (2)(5) (A) OF SC/ST Act b) The Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to grant any other relief as the Hon'ble Court may be deemed fit and proper in the facts and 3 circumstances of the case." 3. At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that during the pendency of the present case, the charge-sheet has been filed. Accordingly, learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw the present Cr.M.P. with liberty to take recourse to law if the petitioner aggrieved by the charge-sheet. 4. The submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner is not opposed by learned counsel for the respondents. 5. In view of the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioners, the present Cr.M.P. stands dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty. 6. Any interim relief granted earlier, if any, stands vacated. Sd/- Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) (Ramesh Sinha) Judge Chief Justice sagrika