Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 23996 (AP)

KORI BANDEPPA v. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER

WP/24163/2024 · 2026-01-05

Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010467852024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] TUESDAY,THE SIXTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 24163/2024 Between: 1. KORI BANDEPPA, S/O.KORI NAGAPPA, AGED ABOUT 72 YEARS, OCC-AGRICULTURE, R/O.KURUVA STREET, NITRAVATTI VILLAGE, HALAHARVI MANDAL, KURNOOL DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, HALAHARVI POLICE STATION, HALAHARVI, KURNOOL DISTRICT. 2. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 3. KORI RAMESH, S/O.KORI SOMALINGAPPA, AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS, OCC- AGRICULTURE, R/O.NITRAVATTI VILLAGE, HALAHARVI MANDAD, KURNOOL DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus to declare the action of the Respondent No.l in interfering with the civil disputes pending between the Petitioner and the Respondent No.3 in respect of the land extent Ac.5-78 cents in Sy.No.151-B of Nitravatti Village, Halaharvi Mandal, Kurnool District without following due process of law as arbitrary, illegal and consequently direct the Respondent No.l not to interfere into the civil disputes pending between the Petitioner and the Respondent No.3 in respect of the land extent Ac.5-78 cents in Sy.No.151-B of Nitravatti Village, Halaharvi Mandal, Kurnool Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. P NAGENDRA REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME 2. SRIDEVI JAMPANI 2 The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, has been filed, by the Petitioner for the following relief: “ ... to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus to declare the action of the Respondent No.l in interfering with the civil disputes pending between the Petitioner and the Respondent No.3 in respect of the land extent Ac.5-78 cents in Sy.No.151-B of Nitravatti Village, Halaharvi Mandal, Kurnool District without following due process of law as arbitrary, illegal and consequently direct the Respondent No.l not to interfere into the civil disputes pending between the Petitioner and the Respondent No.3 in respect of the land extent Ac.5-78 cents in Sy.No.151-B of Nitravatti Village, Halaharvi Mandal, Kurnool ...” Heard learned counsel for the Petitioner and Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home representing for respondent State. Perused the material on record. Learned Assistant Government Pleader on instructions would submit that there are civil disputes between the Petitioner and respondent No.3 with regard to the subject property. Respondent Police never interfered in the civil disputes between the parties. Learned Assistant Government Pleader requested to dispose of the Writ Petition by passing appropriate orders. Learned counsel for the Petitioner would submit that recording the said submission, this Writ Petition may be disposed of. In that view, this Writ Petition is disposed of. No order as to costs. Pending applications, if any, shall stand closed. DR.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Mjl/* 06.01.2026 3 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Writ Petition No. 24163 of 2024 06.01.2025 Mjl /*