p. 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK Biswajit Pasayat (In BLAPL No. 4741 of 2026) Akash Sahu (In BLAPL No. 4855 of 2026) Dhanurjay Khadia (In BLAPL No. 5285 of 2026) Bhola Nayak @ Bhola Naik (In BLAPL No. 5464 of 2026) … Petitioners Ms. M.S. Sahoo, Advocate (In BLAPL Nos.4741 & 5285 of 2026) Mr. R.K. Nayak, Advocate (In BLAPL No. 4855 of 2026) Mr. M.R. Das, Advocate (In BLAPL No. 5464 of 2026) -versus- State of Odisha … Opposite Party Mr. M.R. Patra, Addl. PP CORAM: JUSTICE G. SATAPATHY Order No. ORDER(ORAL): 07.07.2026 1 02. 1. Since these four bail applications arise out of one and same case record, the same are heard together and disposed of by this common order with the consent of the learned counsel for the parties. 2. These are bail applications U/S.483 of BNSS by the petitioners for grant of bail in connection with Laikera P.S. Case No. 76 of 2026 corresponding to C.T. Case No. 388 of 2026 pending in the file of learned S.D.J.M., Jharsuguda, for commission of offences punishable U/Ss. 310(2)/115(2)/111(4)/61(2)(a) of BNS r/w. Section 25(1)(a)/27(1) of Arms act, on the main allegation of committing organised crime and dacoity by trespassing into p. 2 the house of the informant to take away cash of Rs.7Lakhs and other valuables there from. 3. Heard, Ms. Mohini Sahoo, learned counsel for the petitioners in BLAPL Nos. 4741 & 5285 of 2026; Mr. Ranjan Kumar Nayak, learned counsel for the petitioner in BLAPL No. 4855 of 2026; Mr. Manoranjan Das, learned counsel for the petitioner in BLAPL No. 5464 of 2026 and Mr. M.R. Patra, learned Addl. PP in these matters and perused the record. 4. Admittedly, FIR has been lodged against unknown person, but the petitioner Bhola Nayak @ Bhola Naik has been identified in TI parade, whereas the petitioners Biswajit Pasayat, Akash Sahu and Dhanurjay Khadia have never been put to TI parade. Further, the petitioner Bhola Nayak @ Bhola Naik is having some criminal antecedents, but he has not disclosed his criminal antecedents in his bail application. Further, all the petitioners except Bhola Nayak @ Bhola Naik are not reported to have any criminal antecedents. In view of the above facts and taking into account the nature and gravity of the offences as alleged against the petitioners vis-à-vis the accusations sought to be brought against them and regard being had to the mode and manner of implication of the petitioners together with their pre-trial detention in custody with submission of charge sheet in the meantime, this Court while not being inclined to grant bail to the petitioner Bhola Nayak @ Bhola Naik, considers it proper to admit the rest of the petitioners in BLAPL Nos. 4741, 4855 & 5285 of 2026 to bail. Page 3 of 3 5. Hence, the bail application of petitioner-Bhola Nayak @ Bhola Naik in BLAPL No. 5464 of 2026 stands rejected, whereas the bail applications of the petitioners namely Biswajit Pasayat (BLAPL No. 4741 of 2026); Akash Sahu (BLAPL No. 4855 of 2026) and Dhanurjay Khadia (BLAPL No. 5285 of 2026) are allowed and they are allowed to go on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand) each with one solvent surety for the like amount to the satisfaction of the learned Court in seisin of the case on such terms and conditions as deem fit and proper by it with following condition:- (i) the petitioners in the course of trial shall attend the trial Court on each date of posting without fail unless their attendance is dispensed with and they shall cooperate the Court during the trial. In case the Petitioners fail without sufficient cause to appear in the Court in accordance with the terms of the bail, the learned trial Court may proceed against the Petitioners for offence U/S.269 of BNS, 2023 in accordance with law. 6. Accordingly, these BLAPLs stand disposed of. Issue urgent certified copy of the order as per Rules. A soft copy of this order be immediately communicated to the concerned Court, who shall afterwards communicate the same to the concerned Jail through e-mail for reference. (G. Satapathy) Judge S.Sasmal Designation: Jr. Stenographer