- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:30250 WP No. 37893 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 19TH DAY OF JUNE, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH WRIT PETITION NO.37893 OF 2025 (KLR-RES) BETWEEN: SMT. MANJULA, AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS W/O VENKATESH RESIDING AT SITE NO.155 KEMPEGOWDA LAYOUT DODDA NAGAMANGALA BEGUR HOBLI, BENGALURU SOUTH TALUK BENGALURU - 560 068. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. MANJUNATHA B.V., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS CHIEF SECRETARY REVENUE DEPARTMENT VIDHANASOUDHA BENGALURU - 560 001. 2. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER BENGALURU URBAN DISTRICT K.G.ROAD BENGALURU -560 009. Digitally signed by CHAYA S A Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:30250 WP No. 37893 of 2025 3. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER BENGALURU SOUTH SUB-DIVISION K.G.ROAD BENGALURU - 560 009. 4. THE TAHASILDAR BENGALURU SOUTH TALUK K.G.ROAD, BENGALURU - 560 009. …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. B.P. RADHA, AGA ) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE NOTICE BEARING NO.NCR (B) CR/22/2023-24 DATED 22-9-2025, ISSUED BY THE RESPONDENT NO.4 IN RESPECT OF THE LAND BEARING SY.NO.6 OF DODDANAGAMANGALA VILLAGE, BEGUR HOBLI, BENGALURU SOUTH TALUK. AS PER ANNEXURE-A; DIRECTING THE RESPONDENT NO.2 TO ISSUE REVENUE RECORDS IN FAVOUR OF THE PETITIONER. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: ORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH ORAL ORDER 1. In this Writ Petition, petitioner is assailing the notice dated 22.09.2025 (Annexure-A) issued by the respondent No.4. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:30250 WP No. 37893 of 2025 2. Having taken note of the submissions made by the learned counsel appearing for the parties and on careful consideration of the notice would indicate that the petitioner herein is making construction in the land belonging to the Government which is a gomal land. 3. In that view of the matter, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, it is open for the petitioner to file reply/objections to the notice at Annexure-A and after receipt of the same, respondent No.4 shall take decision in the matter in accordance with law. Till consideration of such reply/objections that may be made by the petitioner herein, no precipitative action be taken against the petitioner herein. 4. With the above observation, the Writ Petition is accordingly disposed of. SD/- (E.S.INDIRESH) JUDGE sac List No.: 1 Sl No.: 12