[212] Nishan Singh Dr. Sushil Malik, HCS, Additional Deputy Commissioner, Coram : Present: PANKAJ JAIN [1] stands complied with [2] statement. [3] passed. The present contempt petition is accordingly [4] disposed off 20.04.2026 ‘R. Sharma' IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP-834 Date of Decision : Nishan Singh versus Dr. Sushil Malik, HCS, Additional Deputy Commissioner, Kaithal, District Kaithal, Haryana HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PANKAJ JAIN Mr. Nitish Kumar, Advocate for Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Paramjeet Singh, DAG, Haryana. **** PANKAJ JAIN, J. (ORAL) At the outset, learned State Counsel, submits that the order stands complied with. Learned counsel for the petitioner does not dispute the aforesaid statement. In view of the above, no further orders are required to be passed. The present contempt petition is accordingly All pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, stands disposed off. 20.04.2026 Whether speaking/ reasoned Whether reportable IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 834-2026 (O&M) Date of Decision : 20.04.2026 …Petitioner Dr. Sushil Malik, HCS, Additional Deputy Kaithal, District Kaithal, Haryana ….Respondent PANKAJ JAIN Advocate for Mr. Jarnail Singh Saneta, Mr. Paramjeet Singh, DAG, Haryana. At the outset, learned State Counsel, submits that the order petitioner does not dispute the aforesaid In view of the above, no further orders are required to be passed. The present contempt petition is accordingly disposed off. All pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, stands (PANKAJ JAIN) JUDGE : Yes/No : Yes/No At the outset, learned State Counsel, submits that the order petitioner does not dispute the aforesaid In view of the above, no further orders are required to be All pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, stands RAJNEESH SHARMA 2026.04.20 18:21 I agree to specified portions of this document