Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 2398 (GAU)

ABUL HUSSAIN ALIAS AFSAR ALI v. THE STATE OF ASSAM

Bail Appln./390/2026 · 2026-03-18

Rajesh Mazumdar

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010030222026 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Bail Appln./390/2026 ABUL HUSSAIN ALIAS AFSAR ALI S/OLATE AKBAR ALI RESIDENT OF VILL- FULKUMARI PART-2 GOSOR GAON P.S. AND DIST. BONGAIGAON ASSAM VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REPRESENTED BY THE PP ASSAM ------------ Advocate for : MR. M KHAN Advocate for : PP ASSAM appearing for THE STATE OF ASSAM BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH MAZUMDAR ORDER Date : 19.03.2026 Heard Mr. M. Khan, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner. Also heard Ms. S.H. Bora, learned Addl. P.P. for the State of Assam. Page No.# 2/3 2. The learned Addl. P.P. has assisted in perusing the CD. 3. This is an application under Section 483 of the BNSS, 2023 for granting bail to the petitioner namely Abul Hussain @ Afsar Ali, who was arrested on 29.01.2026 in connection with Bongaigoan P.S. Case No. 13/2026 registered under Section 127 (2)/ 121 (2)/ 132/ 149/ 304 BNS R/W Section 25 (1AB) Arms Act & R/W Section 3 of PDPP Act. 4. The petitioner has been in custody since the last 50 days and it is seen that the FIR does not implicate the petitioner, although alleged persons who had assaulted the police team had been identified and named in the FIR. The FIR was lodged by the victim who was allegedly tortured and assaulted and who had identified the persons who had assaulted and tortured. 5. The learned Addl. P.P has objected to the grant of bail on the ground that several witnesses in the matter have named the petitioner to be involved in the fiasco. 6. The investigation has proceeded to an extent where in the opinion of this Court the petitioner who allegedly called him by the police to identify the persons who were assaulted by police can be granted the privilege of bail. 7. Accordingly, it is provided that the petitioner shall be released on bail on furnishing a bond of Rs. 25,000/- with two sureties of the like Page No.# 3/3 amount to the satisfaction of the Learned CJM Bongaigaon. 8. The learned CJM Bongaigaon shall be at liberty to impose such conditions upon the petitioner as may be deemed necessary to ensure his participation in the investigation. 9. It is directed that any attempt of the petitioner to either influence the investigation or to hamper or temper with the evidence would lead to cancellation of bail. 10. This bail application stands disposed of. JUDGE Comparing Assistant