APHC010465862013 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] WEDNESDAY,THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 11501/2013 Between: 1. P.V.ANJANEYULU,, S/O YEMAIAH, AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS, MECHANIC GRADE-II, APSRTC, E.NO. 5392333, NARASARAOPET BUS DEPOT, RIO. KONTRAMATLA ( VILLAGE & POST ) IPUR MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE REGIONAL MANAGER, APSRTC, GUNTUR REGION, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE DEPOT MANAGER, APSRTC, NARASARAOPET BUS DEPOT, GUNTUR DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ or order or direction more particularly in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of respondents in not paying the subsistence allowances for suspension period from 17-7-2009 to 31-12-2011 and not regularizing the period on duty for all purposes from date of suspension till joining duty i.e., 17-7-2009 to 1-1-2012 is illegal, arbitrary, unjust, unreasonable and violation of the principles of natural justice and consequently direct the respondents to pay the subsistence allowance for suspension period from 17-7-2009 to 31-12-2011 by regularizing the period on duty for all purposes from date of suspension till joining duty i.e., 17-7-2009 to 2 1-1-2012 by considering the petitioner last representation dated 5-4-2012 forthwith IA NO: 1 OF 2013(WPMP 14245 OF 2013 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to pay the subsistence allowance for suspension period from 17-7-2009 to 31-12-2011 by regularizing the period on duty for all purposes from date of suspension till joining duty i.e., 17-7-2009 to 1-1-2012 by considering the petitioner last representation dated 5-4-2012 forthwith pending disposal of the Writ Petition Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. VENKATESWERLLU KESAMSETTY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. P DURGA PRASAD SC FOR APSRTC The Court made the following: 3 Order:- Despite the matter being listed under the caption for dismissal, today none represented for the petitioner. On earlier occasion also, there is no representation for the petitioner. Therefore, this Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. ____________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N 21.01.2026 PNS