Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 23973 (AP)

Dr. D. Balaji Sridhar Reddy v. The Government of Andhra Pradesh

WP/1972/2014 · 2026-03-11

Gannamaneni Ramakrishna Prasad

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 APHC010464042014 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3328] THURSDAY,THE TWELFTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD WRIT PETITION NO: 1972/2014 Between: 1. DR. D. BALAJI SRIDHAR REDDY, S/O D. RADHAKRISHNA REDDY HINDU, AGED 42 YEARS, R/A 18-1-26/M, DWARAKA NAGAR TIRUPATI-517507, CHITTOOR DIST. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, MUNICIPAL ADMN. DEPT., SECRETARIAT, HYDERABAD. 2. THE MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF TIRUPATI, REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER, TIRUPATI CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 3. PANDETIKIRAN KUMAR, S/O P. BALASUBRAMANYAM RAJU, HINDU, AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS, CONTRACTOR, R/A D.NO.1/260, KAVAMMAGUDI STREET, KARVETINAGARAM ROAD, PUTTUR TOWN, CHITTOOR DISTRICT (WRIT PETITION STANDS DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT AS AGAINST RESPONDENT NO.3 FOR NON COMPLIANCE OF C.O DATED 11.04.2017). ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. K S GOPALA KRISHNAN Counsel for the Respondent(S): 2 1. POTHAM VENGALA REDDY SC FOR M.CORPORATION IN RAYALASEEMA REGION 2. GP FOR MUNCIPAL ADMN AND URBAN DEV The Court made the following: 3 ORAL ORDER: Sri P.V. Raghuram, learned Counsel appearing on behalf of Sri K. S. Gopala Krishnan, learned Counsel for the Writ Petitioner, on instructions, submits that this Writ Petition has become infructuous and no further consideration is necessary. 2. Having so recorded, this Writ Petition is disposed of as having become infructuous. No order as to costs. 3 Interlocutory Applications, if any, stand closed in terms of this order. ______________________________________ GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD, J Dt:12.03.2026 Vns