Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Orissa · body

2026 DAILYLAW 23970 (ORI)

SUBASH CHANDRA BISWAL v. STATE OF ODISHA

WP(C)/19937/2026 · 2026-07-03

Biraja Prasanna Satapathy

Writ Petition (Civil)body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.P.(C) No.19937 of 2026 Subash Chandra Biswal …. Petitioner Mr. M.R. Padhi, Adv. -versus- State of Odisha & Others …. Opposite Parties Mr. S.P. Das, ASC COROM: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY Order No ORDER 03.07.2026 01. 1. This matter is taken up through Hybrid Mode. 2. Heard learned counsel for Petitioner and learned counsel for the State-Opposite Parties. 3. The present Writ Petition has been filed inter alia with the following prayer:- “The petitioner, therefore, prays that Your Lordship's may graciously be pleased to admit the writ application, call for the records and after hearing the parties and issue a writ in the nature of Certiorari/Mandamus or any other or further writ/writs), direction/directions directing the opp parties to grant RACP and one increment in favor of the petitioner basis on similar situated in person Sumanta kumar Bhoi and who have joined with the petitioner in different districts i.e Jajpur, Balasore, Bhadkar, Cuttack and Bhubaneswar for the interest of justice. And pass any other order(s), direction (s) as this Hon'ble Court may deems fit and proper. And for this act of kindness the petitioner shall, as in duty bound ever pray.” 4. Learned counsel for the Petitioner submits that through highlighting his grievances, the Petitioner has filed a representation vide Annexure-4 to the Writ Petition, but till date nothing has been done in the matter. In such background, he prays that a direction be issued to Opposite Party No.4 to take a decision on the above noted petition within a specific time period. 5. Considering the submissions made and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, this Court directs Opposite Party No.4 to take a decision on the above noted representation in accordance with law, within a period of three (3) months from the date of production of certified copy of this order and communicate the result of such exercise to the Petitioner. Accordingly, the Writ Petition stands disposed of. (Biraja Prasanna Satapathy) Judge Sipra