Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Orissa · body

2026 DAILYLAW 23968 (ORI)

RAMACHANDRA BARAD v. STATE OF ODISHA

WP(C)/17493/2026 · 2026-07-06

B P Routray

Writ Petition (Civil)body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.P.(C) No.17493 of 2026 Ramachandra Barad & Anr. …. Petitioners Mr. P.K.Nanda, Advocate -versus- State of Odisha and Others …. Opposite Parties Mr. R.Pradhan, ASC CORAM: SHRI JUSTICE B. P. ROUTRAY ORDER 06.07.2026 Order No. 01. 1. The matter is taken up through hybrid mode. 2. Heard Mr. Nanda, learned counsel for the Petitioners and Mr. Pradhan, learned ASC for the State. 3. It is submitted on behalf of the Petitioners that private-Opposite Parties 9 and 10 are constructing their house encroaching public land obstructing the natural flow of water. In this regard they have made a grievance to the Tahasildar and the Tahasildar vide his notice dated 4th February 2026 has directed the Superintending Engineer, Irrigation Division for hearing of the matter. But the matter did not proceed thereafter. In the meantime, a grievance petition has been given to the Collector by the Petitioners and the same is pending consideration. 4. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of at the stage of admission, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the Digitally Signed Signed by: SANGRAM DAS Reason: Authentication Location: High Court of Orissa, Cuttack Date: 06-Jul-2026 17:39:15 Signature Not Verified contention of the Petitioners, with a direction to the Collector, Nayagarh (Opposite Party No.2) to consider the grievance of the Petitioners as per their representation at Annexure-7 by granting due opportunity of hearing to all concern, in accordance with law, within a period of two months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order along with a copy of the writ petition. Till such decision is taken by Opposite Party No.2, status-quo as on date in respect of the disputed government land in question shall be maintained. 5. An urgent certified copy of this order shall be issued on proper application. (B.P. Routray) Judge S.Das