Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 23967 (JHR)

ANKITA VERMA v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND, THROUGH THE CHIEF SECRETARY

WPC/5467/2026 · 2026-08-20

Deepak Roshan

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:JHHC:25203 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P. (S) No. 5467 of 2026 --------- Ankita Verma, aged about 37 year, Daughter of Ravindra Kumar Verma, Resident at House No. 35, Street No. 4, Ward No. 6, Vikas Nagar, P.O. Ramgarh Cantt., P.S.-Ramgarh, District- Ramgarh, Jharkhand - 829122. ....Petitioner(s) Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand, through the Chief Secretary, having its office at Project Building, Dhurwa, P.O. & P.S. Dhurwa Ranchi. 2. Secretary, Department of Personnel, Administration and Rajbhasa, having its office at Project Building, Dhurwa, P.O. & P.S. - Dhurwa, Ranchi. 3. Jharkhand Public Service Commission, through its Secretary, having office at Circular Road, P.O. & P.S.- Lalpur, District Ranchi, Jharkhand – 834001 4. Controller of Examination, Jharkhand Public Service Commission, having office at Circular Road, P.O. &P.S.-Lalpur, District-Ranchi, Jharkhand-834001. ....Respondent(s) --------- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK ROSHAN --------- For the Petitioner(s) : M/s. Amritansh Vats, Arpan M. Ekka, Shivam A. Pathak, Ashish Choudhary, Advocate For the Respondent(s) : Mr. Binit Chandra, A.C. to AAG-III M/s. Sanjoy Piprawall, Prince Kumar, Jay Prakash, Advocates --------- 02/Dated: 20.08.2026 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. Since the advertisement No.06 of 2025 has already been cancelled by the State Government; as such, at this stage learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this writ application to take appropriate remedy at the appropriate time. 3. Accordingly, the instant writ application stands disposed of. Pending I.A., if any, also stands closed. (Deepak Roshan, J.) AUGUST 20, 2026 vikas/- uploaded 27/08/2026