Narkimilli Kumari Jyothi v. The State of Andhra Pradesh
WP/24226/2025 · 2026-03-29
B S Bhanumathi
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 23967 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 23967 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010469022025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3311] Monday, the Thirtieth day of March Two Thousand and Twenty Six Present The Honourable Ms. Justice B.S.Bhanumathi Writ Petition No: 24226 of 2025 Between: Narkimilli Kumari Jyothi ...Petitioner and The State of Andhra Pradesh and others ...Respondents Counsel for the petitioner:
1. V.R. Maheswara Rao Paleti Counsel for the respondents:
1. G.P. for Agricultu re The Court made the following:
2 W.P.No.24226 of 2025 ORDER:
This writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking the following reliefs:
“a) directing the respondent No.2 (the Commissioner and Director of Agricultural Marketing, Andhra Pradesh) to consider and pass appropriate orders on the petitioner's representation dated 18.07.2025, after considering all the materials and recommendations therein, within a stipulated time.
b)To direct respondents Nos.4 and 5 (and their subordinates) not to interfere with the petitioner's peaceful possession and operation of the canteen (Hotel Udupi Aahar in the east-side shed of Alankar Rythu Bazar). In particular, the respondents should be restrained from taking any coercive steps such as disconnecting electricity, locking / sealing the premises, or evicting the petitioner without following due process of law.
c) To direct the respondents that the petitioner shall not be dispossessed from the subject premises except by an order of a competent court / authority following the procedure established by law and pass…”
2. As there was no representation for the petitioner on 23.03.2026, the matter was posted to today i.e., 30.03.2026 under the caption „for dismissal‟. Even today, there is no representation for the petitioner.
3. Hence, the writ petition is dismissed for default. No order as to costs.
Interim orders granted earlier, if any, shall stand vacated. Miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand closed.
_________________________ JUSTICE B.S. BHANUMATHI Dated: 30.03.2026 NSM
3 W.P.No.24226 of 2025 156 The Honourable Ms. Justice B.S.Bhanumathi
Writ Petition No: 24226 of 2025
Dated: 30.03.2026 NSM