Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 23963 (AP)

Kommineni Nagaraja Kumari v. Jetti Ravana Brahma

CC/2289/2014 · 2026-03-16

Harinath N

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010466412014 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] TUESDAY,THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N CONTEMPT CASE NO: 2289/2014 Between: 1. KOMMINENI NAGARAJA KUMARI,, W/O P. SUBBA RAO, AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS, OCC: RETIRED ACCOUNTANT, NO.22, TENALI CO-OPERATIVE URBAN BANK, R/O FLAT NO.202, VISHNU TOWERS, YEDLAPADU, VENKATARAO VEEDI, TENALI, GUNTUR DIST. ...PETITIONER AND 1. JETTI RAVANA BRAHMA, President, No.22, The Tenali Co-operative Urban Bank Ltd., Tenali, T.B. Road, Kkoathapeta, Tenali, Guntur District. ...CONTEMNOR Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to Pleased to Order notice to the respondent and after hearing him, punish him under the provisions of Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 for willfully disobeying this Hon'ble Court order dated 07-07-2014 passed by his Lordship Justice R.Kantha Rao WPMP No.2552/2014 & 2253/2014 in WP No.2096/2014 and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2014(APPL 1294 OF 2014 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased Pleased to direct the respondent to settle and pay Medical Leave encashment amount with held by the 4th respondent Bank to the petitioner and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. G VIJAYA BABU Counsel for the Contemnor: 1. GP FOR COOPERATION (AP) ORDER: 1. It is submitted that Writ Petition No.2096 of 2014 was disposed off by this Court by an order dated 06.06.2019. In view of the said order and the disposal of the writ petition, nothing further survives for consideration in the present contempt proceedings. 2. Accordingly, this Court is of the considered opinion that nothing further remains for adjudication, the present contempt case stands closed. There shall be no order as to costs. Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N Date:17.03.2026 NKA 279 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N CONTEMPT CASE NO:2289 of 2014 Date: 17.03.2026 NKA