Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 23962 (AP)

Tumparthi Dinesh v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

CRLP/9182/2025 · 2026-02-04

Y Lakshmana Rao

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010462472025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3521] THURSDAY,THE FIFTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 9182/2025 Between: 1. TUMPARTHI DINESH, S/O. T. GOWRINADH, AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS, R/O. D.NO. 26-131, KALYANDURGAM ROAD, NEAR JONNA IRON MART, PAPAMPETA, ANANTAPUR, ANDHRA PRADESH. 2. TUMPARTHI SUMITHRA, W/O. T. GOWRINADH, AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS, R/O D.NO. 26-131, KALYANDURGAM ROAD, NEAR JONNA IRON MART, PAPAMPETA, ANANTAPUR, ANDHRA PRADESH 3. TUMPARTHI GOWRINADH, S/O. LATE VENKAT SUBBA, AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS, R/O. D.NO. 26-131, KALYANDURGAM ROAD, NEAR JONNA IRON MART, PAPAMPETA, ANANTAPUR, ANDHRA PRADESH. 4. KARANAM NAGAMANI, D/O K. MADHUSUDHANA RAO, AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS, R/O D.NO. 26-131, KALYANDURGAM ROAD, NEAR JONNA IRON MART, PAPAMPETA, ANANTAPUR, ANDHRA PRADESH. ...PETITIONER/ACCUSED(S) AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH, AMARAVATI. 2. TUMPARTI ANUSHA, W/O TUMPARTI DINESH, R/O. D.NO. 45-38- 50, AKKAYYAPALEM, JAGANNADHAPURAM, VISAKHAPATNAM COMMISSIONERATE, ANDHRA PRADESH. 2 ...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner/accused(S): 1. M SAPTHAGIRI 2. M. SAPTHAGIRI Counsel for the Respondent/complainant(S): 1. SRAVAN KUMAR NAIDANA 2. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR The Court made the following: ORDER: The Criminal Petition has been filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (for brevity ‘the Cr.P.C.,’)/Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for brevity ‘the BNSS’) seeking to quash the proceedings against the Petitioners/Accused Nos.1 to 4 in Crime No.284 of 2024 of Mahila Urban Police Station, Visakhapatnam Commissionerate, registered for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 85, 351(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961. 2. Sri Sapthagiri Metta, the learned counsel for the Petitioners, seeks permission to file a fresh petition in view of the charge sheet filed by the Police. 3. Accordingly, the Criminal Petition is disposed of, granting liberty to the Petitioners to file a fresh petition, if so advised, in accordance with law and in light of the charge sheet filed by the Police. 3 As a sequel, Miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, shall stand closed. _________________________ DR. Y. LAKSHMANA RAO, J Date: 05.02.2026 PRA 4 57 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO CRIMINAL PETITION No.9182 of 2025 Date:05.02.2026 PRA