Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 23961 (KAR)

SMT DAKSHAYINI P v. MRS NARASAMMA

WP/13042/2026 · 2026-06-19

Lalitha Kanneganti

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:30490 WP No. 13042 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 19TH DAY OF JUNE, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI WRIT PETITION NO.13042 OF 2026 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN: SMT DAKSHAYINI P AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS, W/O LATE RENUKAPRASAD. P. R/AT NO.4044, 1ST FLOOR, 2ND STAGE, 3RD MAIN, B BLOCK, SUBRAMANYANAGAR, BENGALURU - 560 021. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. SREEDHAR N.G., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. MRS NARASAMMA AGED ABOUT 77 YEARS, W/O LATE M.PARAMASHIVAYYA, R/A NO.14 AND 25, 5TH CROSS ROAD, NEAR TO NISARGA SCHOOL, NELLAGADHARANAHALLI, NAGASANDRA POST, BENGALURU - 560 073. 2. MR. P. PRAKASH, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, S/O LATE M.PARAMASHIVAYYA, R/A NO.4044, 1ST FLOOR, 2ND STAGE, 3RD MAIN, B BLOCK, SUBRAMANYANAGAR, BENGALURU-560 021. Digitally signed by SUVARNA T Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:30490 WP No. 13042 of 2026 3. MR. P. RUDRESH, AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS, S/O LATE M.PARAMASHIVAYYA, R/AT NO.14 AND 25, 15TH CROSS ROAD, NEAR TO NISARGA SCHOOL, NELLAGADHARANAHALLI, NAGASANDRA POST, BENGALURU - 560 073. (NOTE:RESPONDENT NOS.2 & 3 ARE SONS OF RESPONDENT NO.1 AND R1 IS STAYING WITH R3) …RESPONDENTS THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO GRANT A WRIT OR ORDER OR DIRECTION IN THE NATURE OF CERTIORARI QUASHING THE ENTIRE PROCEEDINGS IN MISC.PET.NO.1062/2024 PENDING ON THE FILE OF THE HON'BLE XV ADDL. CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE (CCH-3) AT BENGALURU (ANNEXURE-G), FILED BY THE RESPONDENT NO.1, AS ILLEGAL, UNJUST AND UNCONSTITUTIONAL. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI ORAL ORDER The present writ petition is filed seeking for the following prayers: “WHEREFORE, the petitioner prays that this Hon’ble High Court be pleased:- 1. To grant a Writ or Order or Direction in the nature of CERTIORARI quashing the entire Proceedings in Misc.Pet.No.1062/2024 pending on the file of the Hon'ble XV Addl. City - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:30490 WP No. 13042 of 2026 Civil and Sessions Judge (CCH-3) at Bengaluru [ANNEXURE-GJ, filed by the Respondent No.1, as illegal, unjust and unconstitutional. 2. To grant such other Writ or Order or Direction as this Hon'ble Court would deem fit and expedient in the circumstances of the case, and 3. To award the cost of this Writ Petition IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY.” 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that against the award passed by the Legal Services Authority, the miscellaneous petition is filed, which is not maintainable and in the light of the settled law, a writ petition has to be filed. Without considering all these aspects, the Court has numbered the petition and is entertaining the same. Hence, he has come before the Court invoking the jurisdiction of this Court under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. 3. According to the petitioner, the miscellaneous petition is not maintainable. In that regard, he should have filed an IA and should have sought for an order on the said IA and if the petitioner is aggrieved by the same, he can avail the legal remedy available to him. For every application that is pending or without even approaching the Court, this Court - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:30490 WP No. 13042 of 2026 cannot invoke the jurisdiction under Article 227 of the Constitution of India by an anticipated order. In that view of the matter, this Court is passing the following: ORDER i. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of giving liberty to the petitioner to raise all these grounds before the trial Court and the trial Court shall consider the same in accordance with law. ii. All pending I.As., if any in the petition shall stand closed. SD/- (LALITHA KANNEGANTI) JUDGE PB List No.: 1 Sl No.: 4