Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2026 DAILYLAW 23955 (PNJ)

SUKET KUMAR GUPTA v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS

CWP/18765/2026 · 2026-06-09

To Be Nominated

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CWP-18765 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT (123) Suket Kumar Gupta State of Punjab and others CORAM: HON'BLE Present: NEERJA K. KALSON 1. Constitution of India decide the legal notice dated 24.04.2026 (Annexure P dated 05.02.2026 (Annexure P has also been made for issuance of direction to stop the illegal construction done by respondent No.3. 2. submitted a No.2- the Commissioner, Municipal Corporation, Kapurthala grievances as raised in Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that at this stage, the petitioner would be satisfied, if appropriate directions are issued to No.2- the Commissioner, Municipal Corpora 18765-2026 (O&M) -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP Date of Decision: Suket Kumar Gupta Versus State of Punjab and others CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NEERJA Mr. Anshul Sharma, Advocate for Mr. Nitin Mittoo, Advocate for the petitioner. **** NEERJA K. KALSON, J. (ORAL) This petition has been field under Constitution of India for issuance of a direction to respo legal notice dated 24.04.2026 (Annexure P dated 05.02.2026 (Annexure P-1) in a time bound manner. A further prayer has also been made for issuance of direction to stop the illegal construction respondent No.3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has a representation dated 05.02.2026 the Commissioner, Municipal Corporation, Kapurthala grievances as raised in the present petition but no action has been taken so far. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that at this stage, the petitioner would be satisfied, if appropriate directions are issued to the Commissioner, Municipal Corpora - IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-18765-2026 (O&M) Date of Decision: 09.06.2026 ......PETITIONER .....RESPONDENTS NEERJA K. KALSON Mr. Anshul Sharma, Advocate for This petition has been field under Article 226 of the for issuance of a direction to respondents no. 1 and 2 to legal notice dated 24.04.2026 (Annexure P-4) and representation 1) in a time bound manner. A further prayer has also been made for issuance of direction to stop the illegal construction Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has 05.02.2026 (Annexure P-1) to respondent the Commissioner, Municipal Corporation, Kapurthala raising his the present petition but no action has been taken so far. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that at this stage, the petitioner would be satisfied, if appropriate directions are issued to respondent the Commissioner, Municipal Corporation, Kapurthala to decide the Article 226 of the 2 to 4) and representation 1) in a time bound manner. A further prayer has also been made for issuance of direction to stop the illegal construction Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has respondent aising his the present petition but no action has been taken so far. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that at this stage, the respondent ecide the ATUL KUMAR TRIPATHI 2026.06.09 20:10 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CWP-18765-2026 (O&M) -2- representation dated 05.02.2026 (Annexure P-1), in a time bound manner and take necessary action. 3. Notice of motion. 4. Mr. Adhiraj Singh, AAG, Punjab, who is present in Court, has accepted the notice on behalf of the respondent No.1-State and submits that needful shall be done in due course. Let a complete set of paper-book be supplied to him during the course of the day 5. Mr. Dharminder Singh Randhawa, Advocate has put in appearance on behalf of respondent No.2 and filed his Memo of Appearance. 6. Without adverting to the merits of the case and in view of the limited prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioner, respondent No.2- the Commissioner, Municipal Corporation, Kapurthala is directed to look into the representation dated 05.02.2026 (Annexure P-1) and decide the same in accordance with law within a period of three weeks from the date of receipt of the certified copy of this order. 7. The present petition is disposed of in the aforesaid terms. (NEERJA K. KALSON) JUDGE 09.06.2026 Atul 1. Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No 2. Whether reportable Yes/No ATUL KUMAR TRIPATHI 2026.06.09 20:10 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document