Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 23950 (JHR)

PUJAN KUMARI v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND THROUGH THE CHIEF SECRETARY, GOVERNMENT OF JHARKHAND

WPC/5132/2026 · 2026-08-18

Deepak Roshan

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

( 2026:JHHC:24907 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P(S). No. 5132 of 2026 ---- 1. Pujan Kumari, Aged about 36 years, Daughter of Govind Prasad, Wife of Ajay Kumar Burnwal, Resident of Village- Katiya, P.O.- Parsabad, P.S.- Jaynagar, District- Koderma, Jharkhand-825318. 2. Kundan Kumar Saw, Aged about 35 years, Son of Late Dinesh Saw, Resident of House No. 451, Bhama Sah Path, Station Road, Chandrapura, P.O. & P.S. Chandrapura, District- Bokaro, Jharkhand-828403. 3. Deepak Gope, Aged about 45 years, Son of Sudhir Gope, Resident of Itki Road, Hehal, Adiwasi Chowk, Bajra, P.O.- Hehal, P.S.- Sukhdev Nagar, District- Ranchi, Jharkhand-834005. 4. Vandana Kumari, Aged about 43 years, Daughter of Sheo Prasad Sharma, Resident of New Makchund Toli, Near Aangan Palace, P.O. & P.S.-Chutia, District- Ranchi, Jharkhand-834001. 5. Bablu Kumar, Aged about 36 years, Son of Audhesh Kumar Singh, Resident of Adarsh Nagar, Kokar Chowk, P.O.- Kokar, P.S.- Sadar, District- Ranchi, Jharkhand-834001. 6. Suraj Kumar, Aged about 37 years, Son of Late Santu Sahu, Resident of Village- Pundag, P.O.-Pundag, P.S.- Jagannathpur, District- Ranchi, Jharkhand-834004 7. Archana Kumari, Aged about 40 years, Daughter of Sunil Pandey, Resident of Village- Mangra, P.O. & P.S.- Barwadih. District Latehar, Jharkhand-822111 8. Ashok Oraon, Aged about 32 years, Son of Late Buddhdev Oraon, Resident of Village- Antikheta, P.O.- Kumandi, P.S. Manika, District- Latehar, Jharkhand-829204. 9. Rajaram Mahto, Aged about 43 years, Son of Niranjan Mahto, Resident of Village- Dungridih, Post- Urmal, P.S. Chowka, District- Seraikella- Kharsawan, Jharkhand-832404. 10. Supriya Rai, Aged about 41 years, Daughter of Sant Kumar Rai, Resident of Flat No. 4C, Block-2, Trimurti Apartment, Near Dhaiya, P.O.- ISMU, P.S.- Dhanbad (Sadar), District- Dhanbad, Jharkhand-826004. 11. Gita Kumari, 43 years, Daughter of Gopal Chandra Roy, Resident of Village- Ghorpas, P.O. & P.S.- Sarwan, District- Deoghar, Jharkhand-814150. 12. Ahuti Priya, Aged abut 38 years, Daughter of Shailendra Kumar Singh, Resident of Village-Diyara, P.O. Simrda, P.S. Godda, District-Godda, Jharkhand-814133. …Petitioner ( 2026:JHHC:24907 ) VERSUS 1. The State of Jharkhand through the Chief Secretary, Government of Jharkhand, having office at Project Building, Dhurwa, P.O. & P.S. Dhurwa, District -Ranchi 2. The Principal Secretary, School Education and Literacy Department, Government of Jharkhand, Project Building, Dhurwa, P.O: Dhurwa, P.S- Dhurwa, Dist- Ranchi 3. The Principal Secretary, Department of Personnel, Administrative Reforms and Raj Bhasha, Government of Jharkhand, Project Building. Dhurwa, P.O: Dhurwa, P.S- Dhurwa, Dist- Ranchi 4. The Director, Secondary Education, Government of Jharkhand, Project Building, Dhurwa, P.O: Dhurwa, P.S- Dhurwa, Dist- Ranchi 5. The Chairman, Jharkhand Staff Selection Commission, At- Kalinagar, Chai Bagan, P.O. & P.S.-Namkum, Ranchi-834010 6. The Secretary, Jharkhand Staff Selection Commission, At- Kalinagar, Chai Bagan, P.O. & P.S.-Namkum, Ranchi-834010 7. The Examination Controller, Jharkhand Staff Selection Commission, At- Kalinagar, Chai Bagan, P.O. & P.S.- Namkum, Ranchi-834010. …Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK ROSHAN --- For the Petitioners : Mr. Shekhar Prasad Gupta, Advocate For the Respondents : Mr. Tejo Mistry, Advocate --- 06/ Dated: 18.08.2026 1. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the issue involved in this writ application is same and similar with that of W.P. (S) No. 582 of 2023 with analogous cases in which the petitioners were given liberty to approach the One- Man Fact Finding Commission; accordingly, he prays that the instant writ application may be disposed of by granting the aforesaid liberty. 2. Learned counsel for the respondents does not oppose the aforesaid contention. 3. Accordingly, the instant writ application stands disposed of by granting liberty to the petitioners to approach the One-Man Fact Finding Commission. (Deepak Roshan, J.) 18.08.2026 Abha/-