Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 23948 (KAR)

MR VAMANA SHENOY v. MR DHARMAPALA

CRL.RP/368/2025 · 2026-06-23

H P Sandesh

Criminal Appealbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:31329 CRL.RP No. 368 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 23RD DAY OF JUNE, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.368 OF 2025 BETWEEN: MR VAMANA SHENOY S/O MOHANADAS SHENOY AGED 50 YEARS BRANCH MANAGER H.D.F.C. LIFE INSURANCE BOLUVARU PUTTUR-574 201 …PETITIONER (BY SRI. JINENDRA B, ADVOCATE [ABSENT]) AND: MR DHARMAPALA S/O BABUDAS AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS R/AT ‘JALAJA COMPOUND’ MAJILA, JAPPU BAPPAL KANKANADY, MANGALURU D.K. DISTRICT-575001 …RESPONDENT (BY SRI. MELWYN DAVID MASCARENHAS, ADVOCATE) THIS CRL.RP IS FILED U/S. 397 R/W 401 OF CR.P.C PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE JUDGEMENT OF CONVICTION DATED 16.01.2025, PASSED BY THE HONBLE II ADDL. Digitally signed by DEVIKA M Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:31329 CRL.RP No. 368 of 2025 DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, DAKSHINA KANNADA, MANGALURU, IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.32/2023 AND ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH ORAL ORDER The counsel for the petitioner is absent. 2. On perusal of the order sheet, it discloses that conditional order passed by this Court is not complied by the petitioner. The matter was referred to the mediation but not settled before the mediation since both the parties never appeared before the mediation centre. As the petitioner has not complied with the conditional order passed by this Court while suspending the sentence and this revision petition is also not yet admitted, the revision petition is dismissed as not required to consider the same in view of non-compliance of the conditional order of this Court. Sd/- (H.P.SANDESH) JUDGE SN