Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 23948 (JHR)

MUBARAK HUSSAIN v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

WPC/6381/2018 · 2026-08-24

Sri Ananda Sen

Writ Petition (Civil)body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:JHHC:25562 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI WP(C) No.6381 of 2018 ----- Mubarak Hussain, son of late Karamat Hussain, resident of village Bhairochak, PO and PS Mahagama, District Godda … Petitioner(s). Versus 1.The State of Jharkhand 2.Deputy Commissioner, Godda 3.Sub Divisional Officer, Godda 4.Circle Officer, Mahagama, PO and PS Mahagama, District Godda 5.Md. Naziruddin, son of late Sarajuddin, resident of Bhairochak, PO and PS Mahagama, District Godda 6(a) Mahfuz Alam 6(b) Bibi Dukhni, wife of Md. Habib 6(c)Md. Saddam All are sons and daughter of Md. Choolai All are resident of village Bhairochak, PO and PS Mahagama, District Godda … Respondent(s). CORAM : SRI ANANDA SEN, J. ------ For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. Abdul Wahab, Advocate For the Respondents : Mr. Manoj Kumar, GA-III Mr. Rakesh Kr. Roy, AC to GA-III Mr. Purnendu Kr. Jha, Advocate …...... 13 /24.08.2026: Heard the learned counsel representing the petitioner and the learned counsel representing the respondents. 2. The original respondent no. 6 was appointed as a Pradhan. The said appointment was challenged by the petitioner in this writ petition. Now it is admitted that the respondent no. 6 is dead. The State is initiating a process to appoint new Pradhan. 3. Considering the aforesaid fact, since respondent no. 6 who was the Pradhan and whose appointment was challenged is already dead, no relief can be granted to the petitioner in this writ petition. 2026:JHHC:25562 2 4. If the petitioner wants to intervene in the appointment of the new Pradhan, it will be open to the petitioner to do so. 5. Accordingly, this writ petition is disposed of. (ANANDA SEN, J.) 24.08.2026 Tanuj/CP-2 Uploaded on 27.08.2026