Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Orissa · body

2026 DAILYLAW 23944 (ORI)

SUNITA BADAJENA v. STATE OF ODISHA

ABLAPL/7227/2026 · 2026-07-01

R K Pattanaik

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK ABLAPL No.7227 of 2026 Sunita Badajena …. Petitioner Mr. M. K. Chand, Advocate -Versus- State of Odisha …. Opposite Party Ms. B. K. Sahu, AGA CORAM: MR. JUSTICE R.K. PATTANAIK Order No. ORDER 01.07.2026 01. 1. Heard learned counsel for the respective parties. 2. Instant petition under Section 482 BNSS is filed for pre-arrest bail of the petitioner in connection with Jankia P.S. Case No.395 of 2026 corresponding to G.R. Case No.833 of 2026 pending in the file of learned J.M.F.C.(Cog.), Khurda on the grounds stated therein. 3. Perused the FIR as at Annexure-1. The dispute is in the family of the petitioner. The informant is the co-sister-in-law of the petitioner. Considering the submission of Mr. Chand, learned counsel for the petitioner and objection of the State, this Court though not in favour of entertaining the bail plea, is inclined to direct the petitioner to surrender before the learned court below for being released with conditions. 4. Accordingly, it is ordered. 5. In the result, the ABLAPL is disposed of. It is directed that in the event, the petitioner surrenders before the learned J.M.F.C.(Cog.), Khurda in connection with Jankia P.S. Case No.395 of 2026 corresponding to G.R. Case No.833 of 2026 within a fortnight from today, she shall be released on bail upon furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(rupees ten thousand only) with one solvent surety for the like amount and such other terms and conditions as deemed just and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case besides the following, such as, she shall not commit any further mischief involving the informant while on bail. 6. Issue urgent certified copy as per rules. (R.K. Pattanaik) Judge Sumitra