Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 23944 (KAR)

SRI M JAYANNA v. SRI FAZLULLA KHAN

CRL.A/1093/2013 · 2026-06-09

S Rachaiah

Criminal Appealbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:27532 CRL.A No. 1092 of 2013 C/W CRL.A No. 1093 of 2013 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 09TH DAY OF JUNE, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S RACHAIAH CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 1092 OF 2013 (A) C/W CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 1093 OF 2013 (A) IN CRL.A No. 1092/2013 BETWEEN: SRI A MURALIDHARA REDDY AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS, SON OF LATE SRI A C VENKATARAMAPPA, RESIDING AT : #21/2, PATEL SEETHAPPA COLONY, 8TH MAIN ROAD, NEW THIPPASANDRA, BANGALORE – 560 075. …APPELLANT (BY SMT. S.B.LAKSHMI, ADVOCATE) AND: SRI FAZLULLA KHAN AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS SON OF SRI RASHEED KHAN RESIDING AT: #19, 4TH CROSS 1ST MAIN, ANNASANDRAPALYA BANGALORE – 560 017. Digitally signed by SUSHMA LAKSHMI B S Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:27532 CRL.A No. 1092 of 2013 C/W CRL.A No. 1093 of 2013 ALSO AT: M/S MISBA REAL ESTATE, SHOP NO.9, 1ST MAIN LAL BAHADUR SHASTRY NAGAR, BANGALORE – 560 017. …RESPONDENT (BY SRI. T. PRAKASH, ADVOCATE) ---- THIS CRL.A. IS FILED U/S.378(4) CR.P.C PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE JUDGMENT OF ACQUITTAL DATED 13.09.2013 PASSED BY THE XIV A.C.M.M., BANGALORE IN C.C.NO.26870/2011 - ACQUITTING THE RESPONDENT / ACCUSED FOR THE OFFENCE P/U/S 138 OF NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENTS ACT. IN CRL.A NO. 1093/2013 BETWEEN: SRI. M JAYANNA AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS, S/O LATE SRI. MALLE GOWDA, RESIDING AT: # 15, 1ST CROSS, OPP. AKHTAR COMPOUND, 1ST MAIN, LAL BAHADUR SHASTRY NAGAR, BANGALORE – 560 017. ...APPELLANT (BY SMT. S.B.LAKSHMI, ADVOCATE) - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:27532 CRL.A No. 1092 of 2013 C/W CRL.A No. 1093 of 2013 AND: SRI FAZLULLA KHAN AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS, S/O SRI RASHEED KHAN, RESIDING AT # 19, 4TH CROSS, 1ST MAIN, ANNASANDRAPALYA, BANGALORE – 560 017. ALSO AT: M/S.MISBA REAL ESTATE, SHOP NO.9, 1ST MAIN, LAL BAHADUR SHASTRY NAGAR, BANGALORE – 560 017. ...RESPONDENT (BY SRI. T. PRAKASH, ADVOCATE) ---- THIS CRL.A. FILED U/S.378(4) CR.P.C PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE JUDGMENT OF ACQUITTAL DATED 13.09.2013 PASSED BY THE XIV A.C.M.M., MAYO HALL UNIT, BANGALORE IN C.C.NO.26628/2011 - ACQUITTING THE RESPONDENT / ACCUSED FOR THE OFFENCE P/U/S 138 OF NEGOTIABLE INSTUMENTS ACT. THESE APPEALS, COMING ON FOR REPORTING SETTELLEMENT, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S RACHAIAH - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:27532 CRL.A No. 1092 of 2013 C/W CRL.A No. 1093 of 2013 ORAL JUDGMENT 1. Heard Smt. S.B. Lakshmi, learned counsel for the appellants and Sri. T. Prakash, learned counsel for the common respondent, in both appeals. 2. Criminal Appeal No.1092/2013 is filed by the appellant / complainant seeking to set aside the judgment dated 13.09.2013 in C.C. No.26870/2011 passed by the XIV Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Mayo Hall Unit, Bangalore. 3. Criminal Appeal No.1093/2013 is filed by the appellant / complainant seeking to set aside the judgment dated 13.09.2013 in C.C. No.26628/2011 passed by the XIV Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Mayo Hall Unit, Bangalore. 4. Learned counsel for the appellants and the common respondent submit that the parties have settled the matters amicably in the mediation before the Karnataka Mediation Centre. - 5 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:27532 CRL.A No. 1092 of 2013 C/W CRL.A No. 1093 of 2013 5. The appellants and the respondent are present before this Court and they have been identified by their respective counsel. 6. As per the submission of the learned counsel for the respective parties, both parties have adhered to the terms and conditions stipulated in the mediation report. The learned counsel for the appellants submitted that the appellants have received the amount as required to be paid and there is no balance amount remaining to be paid and the case may be disposed of. The submission is placed on record. 7. Accordingly, I proceed to pass the following: ORDER The Criminal Appeals stand disposed of in terms of the settlement arrived at between the parties before the Karnataka Mediation Centre. The efforts rendered by the learned counsel for respective parties are hereby appreciated. - 6 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:27532 CRL.A No. 1092 of 2013 C/W CRL.A No. 1093 of 2013 In view of the disposal the appeal, pending I.A., does not survive for consideration and the same is also disposed of. Sd/- (S RACHAIAH) JUDGE Bss List No.: 1 Sl No.: 56