Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 23941 (JHR)

SATYAM KUMAR TIWARI @ SATYAM KUMAR TEWARY v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./7963/2026 · 2026-08-25

Anil Kumar Choudhary

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:JHHC:25597] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.7963 of 2026 ------ Satyam Kumar Tiwari @ Satyam Kumar Tewary, aged about 28 years, S/o Bam Shankar Tiwari @ Bam Shankar Tewary, R/o Dharkiro, Roham, P.O. & P.S.- Rajganj, Dist. Dhanbad. .... .... …. Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand .... .... .... Opposite Party ------ CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Shailesh Kumar Singh, Advocate (through video conferring) Mr. Abhijeet Kumar Singh, Advocate. For the State : Mrs. Mahua Palit, Addl.P.P. ------ Order No:-02 Dated:-25-08-2026 Heard the parties. The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Topchanchi P.S. Case No. 75 of 2026 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 132, 121(1), 352, 351(2), 3(5) of the B.N.S., 2023. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner was involved in demanding extortion from the Hotel Manager of a Hotel and when police reached the place of occurrence and arrested the petitioner, he attempted to flee away and the co-accused persons manhandled the informant- Police Officer deterring him from discharge his duty and tried to snatch away his service revolver but by the time, more police force arrived at the place of occurrence and the petitioner could not escape and apprehended along with the co-accused person. It is next submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. It is further submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 23.07.2026 as mentioned in para-01 of the instant bail application. It is further submitted that the co-accused person of this case has been admitted to bail by this Court vide order dated 21.08.2026 in B.A. No. 7880 of 20206. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner undertakes to co-operate with the trial of the case and also undertakes not to annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be released on bail. Learned counsel appearing for the State opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioner. Considering the facts of this case, the above-named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount to the satisfaction of the learned C.J.M., Dhanbad in connection with Topchanchi P.S. Case No. 75 of 2026 with the condition that he will co-operate with the trial of the case and furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case and he will not annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Dated:- 25.08.2026 Amar/