Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P.(C) No.19374 of 2026
Prasmita Palei …. Petitioner Mr. P.K. Mahapatra,Advocate
-versus-
State of Odisha & Others
….
Opposite Parties Mr. A. Tripathy, AGA
COROM:
JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY
Order No
ORDER 03.07.2026
01. 1. This matter is taken up through Hybrid Mode.
2. Heard learned counsel for appearing for the Parties.
3. The present Writ Petition has been filed inter alia with the following prayer:-
“ In view of the aforesaid facts and circumstances as narrated above it is prayed that this Hon'ble Court be graciously be pleased to admit the Writ Petition and issue Rule Nisi or any other appropriate Writs against the Opp. parties calling upon the opposite parties to show cause as to why they, particularly OP no.3, shall not be directed to appoint the petitioner under Rehabilitation Assistance Scheme; And, if the Opp. Parties failed to show cause or show insufficient cause, make the said Rule absolute by directing the Opp. Parties, particularly OP no.3, to appoint the petitioner under Assistance Scheme. Rehabilitation And/or issue any other appropriate Writ/Writs,
order/orders, direction/directions as deem fit and proper in the fitness of the case. And for which act of your kindness the petitioner shall remain duty bound as ever.”. p. 2p. 2
4. In course of hearing, learned counsel for the Petitioner states that application made by the Petitioner vide Annexure-4 to get the benefit of appointment under the R.A. Scheme, though is pending before Opposite Party No.3, but no decision is being taken on the same.
5. As agreed by learned counsel for the parties and after going through the records, this Court, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, disposes of the Writ Petition directing Opposite Party No.3 to consider the application filed by the petitioner vide Annexure-4 within a period of three (3) months from the date of production of certified copy of this order with due communication to the Petitioner.
Accordingly, the Writ Petition stands disposed of.
(Biraja Prasanna Satapathy)
Judge
Subrat