Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Himachal Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 23937 (HP)

MANJU THAKUR AND ORS v. THE STATE OF HP AND OTHERS

CWP/16531/2026 · 2026-09-23

Jyotsna Rewal Dua

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No. 16531/2026 a/w connected matters Decided on: 23.09.2026 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. CWP No. 16531/2026 Manju Thakur & Ors. …..Petitioners Versus State of H.P. and Ors. .....Respondents 2. CWP No. 16532/2026 Naresh Kumar …..Petitioners Versus State of H.P. and Ors. .....Respondents 3. CWP No. 16536/2026 Roma Devi …..Petitioner Versus State of H.P. and Ors. .....Respondents 4. CWP No. 16539/2026 Hoshiyar Singh …..Petitioner Versus State of H.P. and Ors. .....Respondents 5. CWP No. 16540/2026 Sunil Sen …..Petitioner Versus State of H.P. and Ors. .....Respondents 6. CWP No. 16553/2026 Sunita Kumari …..Petitioner 2 Versus State of H.P. and Ors. .....Respondents 7. CWP No. 16557/2026 Pradeep Mahajan …..Petitioner Versus State of H.P. and Ors. .....Respondents 8. CWP No. 16564/2026 Amir Singh & Ors. …..Petitioners Versus State of H.P. and Ors. .....Respondents ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Coram Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Petitioners: Mr. Bhender K. Chaudhary, Mr. Anil Kumar, Piyush Dhanotia, Mr. Piyush Agnihotri, Mr. Surila Sangam, Advocates, for the petitioners in the respective petitions. For the Respondents: Mr. Anup Rattan, Advocate General with Mr. Y.P.S. Dhaulta, Additional Advocate General, in all the petitions. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge Petitioners seek applicability of Ghanshyam Dass and Ors Vs. State of H.P. and Ors2. 2. Learned Additional Advocate General has apprised that the aforesaid decision has been stayed under order dated 1Whether reporters of print and electronic media may be allowed to see the order? Yes. 2 CWP No. 2056 of 2023 decided alongwith connected matters on 21.03.2024 3 17.08.2026 passed in LPA No.205 of 2025 and other connected matters. 3. In view of above position, the relief in the nature claimed by the petitioners cannot be granted to them at this stage. These writ petitions, therefore, are disposed of with direction to the respondents to consider the cases of the petitioners within six weeks after the adjudication of LPA No.205 of 2025 and in terms thereof. 4. With the above observations, these writ petitions stand disposed of. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, also to stand disposed of. Jyotsna Rewal Dua 23rd September, 2026 Judge rohit