Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
( 2026:JHHC:25483 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
B.A. No.7890 of 2026
------
1. Karim Ansari, S/o Jalil Ansari, aged about 39 years,
2. Inamul Ansari @ Enamul Ansari S/o Jalaluddin Ansari, aged about 21 years,
3. Kabir Ansari, S/o Saryatulla Ansari, aged about 24 years,
4. Sahnawaj Ansari, s/o Kalimuddin Ansari, aged about 19 years, All R/o Phulbhanga, P.O. & P.S.-Barhait, District-Sahibganj.
.... .... …. Petitioners
Versus
The State of Jharkhand
.... .... .... Opposite Party
------
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
------
For the Petitioners : Mr. Santosh Kr. Jha, Advocate
For the State
: Mrs. Amrita Kumari, Addl.P.P
------
Order No.02 Dated- 24-08-2026
Heard the parties. The petitioners have moved this Court for grant of bail in connection with Barhait P.S. Case No.68 of 2026 registered for the offences punishable under sections 190, 191(2), 191(3), 109(1), 115(2), 118(1), 126(2) & 117(2) of the B.N.S., 2023. The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the allegation against the petitioners is that the petitioners were members of an unlawful assembly and in prosecution of the common object of the assembly attempted to murder Nanaji Sabarli Ansari and his family members by using stick, iron rods, spears and axes. It is further submitted that the allegations against the petitioners are all false. It is then submitted that though the victims were advised X-ray and CT Scan of the injury, but the same has not been brought on record. It is next submitted that the petitioners have no criminal antecedent as has been mentioned in paragraph no.11 of this bail application. It is then submitted that the petitioners have been in custody since 02.06.2026, as has been mentioned in paragraph no.01 of the bail application. It is lastly submitted that the petitioners undertake to cooperate with the trial of the case and further undertake that they will not annoy or disturb the
witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioners be admitted to bail. The learned Addl. P.P. opposes the prayer for bail. Considering the submissions of the counsels and the fact as discussed above, I am inclined to enlarge the abovenamed petitioners on bail. Accordingly, the petitioners are directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned SDJM, Sahibganj in connection with Barhait P.S. Case No.68 of 2026 with the condition that the petitioners will cooperate with the trial of the case and will furnish their mobile numbers and a copy of their Aadhar Cards in the court below with the undertaking that they will not change their mobile numbers during the trial of the case, with further condition that they will not annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case.
(Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) 24/08/2026 Abhiraj/