Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 2393 (JHR)

MAHENDRA GANJHU v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

Cont.(Cvl)/185/2026 · 2026-03-11

Gautam Kumar Choudhary

Contempt Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:JHHC:6410 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cont. Case (Civil) No. 185 of 2026 ----- Mahendra Ganjhu, S/o Late Jaynath Ganjhu, R/o Village-Amarwadih, P.O.-Balumath, P.S.-Balumath, Dist.-Latehar, Jharkhand … …. Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. Kokila Kumari, The Circle Officer, Bariyatu, Latehar, P.O. & P.S.-Latehar, Dist.-Latehar … …. Opp. Parties ----- CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GAUTAM KUMAR CHOUDHARY ----- For the Petitioner : Mr. Vijayant Verma, Advocate For the O.P.-State : Mr. Dheeraj Kr. Dubey, AC to AG Mr. Ritesh Ranjan, AC to AG. ----- Oral Order 03 / Dated : 11.03.2026 In compliance of the earlier order dated 20.02.2026, Opposite Party No. 2- Circle Officer, Bariyatu, Latehar is present in person before this Court and seeks permission to file show cause in compliance of the order passed by this Court. It is submitted that the order under contempt has already been complied with, as the representation of the petitioner has been disposed of by speaking and reasoned order on 22.05.2025 which has been annexed as Annexure-A to the show cause. In view of the fact that the representation of the petitioner has been disposed of, this contempt proceeding is dropped and the contempt petition stands disposed of. However, if the petitioner has any grievance against the order passed by the contemnor-opposite party no. 2, he may challenge that order before an appropriate Forum. (Gautam Kumar Choudhary, J.) AKT/Satendra Uploaded 11.03.2026