IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Cr. MP(M) No. 92 of 2026 Date of Decision : 19.1.2026 Ashu ....Petitioner Versus State of H.P. ....Respondent Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rakesh Kainthla, Vacation Judge. Whether approved for reporting? 1 No. For the petitioner : Mr. Gurdev Negi, Advocate. For the respondent/State : Mr. Diwakar Dev Sharma, Additional Advocate General, assisted by SI Ram Lal, IO, PS Sadar, Bilaspur, HP. Rakesh Kainthla, Judge (Oral) Notice. Mr. Divakar Dev Sharma, learned Additional Advocate General, appears and waives service of notice on behalf of the respondent-State. Learned counsel for the petitioner, under instructions, submits that he wants to withdraw the present petition at this stage. Hence, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn, so also the pending miscellaneous application(s), if any. (Rakesh Kainthla) Vacation Judge 19th January, 2026 (Nikita) 1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes.