Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 23929 (KAR)

SRI KIRAN C v. STATE OF KARNATAKA

CRL.P/7537/2026 · 2026-06-17

M Nagaprasanna

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:29841 CRL.P No. 7537 of 2026 C/W CRL.P No. 7538 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 17TH DAY OF JUNE, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 7537 OF 2026 C/W CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 7538 OF 2026 IN CRL.P No. 7537/2026 BETWEEN: 1. SRI KIRAN C, S/O CHANDRASHAKARAIAH.V, AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS, R/AT R/O NO 397, POST OFFICE ROAD, JANATHA COLONY, BANNERUGHATTA, BANGALORE SOUTH DISTRICT-560083. 2. SMT. VIDYA.C, D/O CHANDRASHEKARAIAH.V, AGED ABOUT 26 YEARS, R/O NO 397, POST OFFICE ROAD, JANATHA COLONY, BANNERUGHATTA, BANGALORE SOUTH DISTRICT, BENGALURU 560083. 3. SRI CHANDRASHEKARAIAH.V, AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS, R/O NO 397, POST OFFICE ROAD, JANATHA COLONY, BANNERUGHATTA, Digitally signed by PADMAVATHI B K Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:29841 CRL.P No. 7537 of 2026 C/W CRL.P No. 7538 of 2026 BANGALORE SOUTH DISTRICT, BENGALURU 560083. 4. SMT. MANJULA, W/O CHANDRASHEKARAIAH, AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS, R/O NO 397, POST OFFICE ROAD, JANATHA COLONY, BANNERUGHATTA, BANGALORE SOUTH DISTRICT, BENGALURU 560083. ADDRESS AS PER AADHAR. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI BIPIN B.S, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA, BY STATION HOUSE OFFICER, BAGALAGUNTE POLICE STATION, CHIKKABANAVARA SUB DIVISION, BENGALURU CITY – 560 073. REPRESENTED BY THE STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, BENGALURU 560001. 2. SRI BHUVAN S, S/O LATE SRINIVAS, AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS, WORKING AS BBMP STAFF, R/O NO. 43, 3RD CROSS, NMH LAYOUT, NEAR GANESHA TEMPLE, - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:29841 CRL.P No. 7537 of 2026 C/W CRL.P No. 7538 of 2026 KIRLOSKAR LAYOUT, BENGALURU CITY - 560073. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI K NAGESHWARAPPA, HCGP FOR R-1; SRI VINOD KUMAR.M, ADVOCATE FOR R-2) THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S.482(FILED U/S.528 BNSS) CR.P.C TO QUASH THE FIR IN CRIME NO.158/2026 (ANNEXURE A) DATED 09.04.2026 REGISTERED BY BAGALAGUNTE POLICE STATION, BENGLAURU CITY FOR THE OFFENCES P/U/S 115(2),118(1),351(2),3(5) AND 352 OF BNS 2023 AND ALL FURTHER PROCEEDINGS PURSUANT THERETO, PENDING ON THE FILE OF THE COURT OF XXXI ADDL. CJM BENGALURU CITY, IN SO FAR AS THE PRESENT PETITIONERS (ACCUSED NO.1 TO 4) ARE CONCERNED. IN CRL.P NO. 7538/2026 BETWEEN: 1. SRI BHUVAN S, S/O LATE SRINIVAS, AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS, R/O NO. 128, 9TH CROSS, 1ST N BLOCK, RAJAJINAGAR, BANGALORE NORTH, BENGALURU-560010. 2. SMT. K. BHAGYA, W/O LATE SRINIVAS, AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS, WIDOW, RESIDING AT NO. 128, 9TH CROSS, 1ST N BLOCK, RAJAJINAGAR, BANGALORE NORTH, BENGALURU-560010. - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:29841 CRL.P No. 7537 of 2026 C/W CRL.P No. 7538 of 2026 3. SMT. PAVANA S, W/O NACHAPPA, AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS, R/O BESUGURU VILLAGE, BEKKE SODLUR POST, KODAGU DISTRICT-571216. ADDRESS AS PER AADHAR. ...PETITIONERS (BY SRI VINOD KUMAR M, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA, BY STATION HOUSE OFFICER, NORTH WOMEN POLICE STATION, J.C. NAGAR SUB-DIVISION, BENGALURU, REPRESENTED BY THE STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, BENGALURU 560001. 2. SMT. VIDYA C, W/O SRI. BHUVAN S, AGED ABOUT 25 YEARS, R/O NO 397, POST OFFICE ROAD, JANATHA COLONY, BANNERUGHATTA, BANGALORE SOUTH DISTRICT, BENGALURU 560083. ...RESPONDENTS (BY SRI K NAGESHWARAPP, HCGP FOR R-1; SRI BIPIN.B.S, ADVOCATE FOR R-2) THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S 482 CR.PC (FILED U/S 528 BNSS) TO QUASH THE FIR IN CR.NO.52/2026 (ANNEXURE- A) DATED 14.04.2026 REGISTERED BY THE NORTH WOMEN - 5 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:29841 CRL.P No. 7537 of 2026 C/W CRL.P No. 7538 of 2026 P.S. BENGALURU FOR THE OFFENCE P/U/S 85,115(2),351(2),352 R/W 3(5) OF BNS 2023 AND SEC.3,4 OF D.P ACT 1961 PENDING BEFORE THE 32ND A.C.M.M AT BENGALURU. THESE PETITIONS, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA ORAL ORDER Petitioners - accused Nos.1 to 4 in Crl.P.No.7537/2026, are the wife and her family members, are before this Court calling in question registration of a crime in Crime No.158/2026, pending before the XXXI Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bengaluru City, for the offences under Sections 115(2), 118(1), 351(2), 3(5) and 352 of the BNS, 2023 and petitioners – accused Nos.1 to 3 in Crl.P.No.7538/2026 are the husband and his family members call in question registration of a crime in Crime No.52/2026, pending before the XXXII Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Bengaluru City, for the offences under Sections 85, 115(2), 351(2), 352 r/w. 3(5) of the BNS, 2023. It is a case and counter case by both the couple and their family. - 6 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:29841 CRL.P No. 7537 of 2026 C/W CRL.P No. 7538 of 2026 2. Heard Sri Bipin B.S., learned counsel for the wife, Sri K. Nageshwarappa, learned High Court Government Pleader for respondent No.1 – State and Sri Vinod Kumar M., learned counsel for the husband. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners and respondent No.2 in both the petitions would submit that during the pendency of these petitions, the parties to the lis have arrived at settlement and the couple have reunited. They have also filed joint memos, affidavits of the complainants in both the petitions. 4. The joint memo filed in Crl.P.No.7537/2026, reads as follows: ““1. The above Criminal Petition has been filed by the Petitioners seeking quashing of FIR in Crime No. 158/2026 dated 09 04 2026 came to be registered by Bagalagunte Police Station for the offences punishable under Sections 115(2), 118(1), 351(2), 3(5) and 352 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. 2. Due to matrimonial differences between Petitioner No.2 - Smt Vidya and Respondent No.2 - certain disputes arose, which led to filing of the said complaint and registration of the above FIR. 3. With the intervention of elders, relatives and well wishers, the parties have amicably resolved all their disputes. Petitioner No.2 and Respondent No.2 have decided to continue their marital relationship and live together as - 7 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:29841 CRL.P No. 7537 of 2026 C/W CRL.P No. 7538 of 2026 husband and wife in a separate, independent residence, away from other family members. It is agreed between the parties that: a) Petitioner No.2 and Respondent No.2 shall reside together in a separate residence of their choice; b) The family members of both sides, shall not interfere in the day to day matrimonial life and domestic affairs of the couple; 4. Respondent No.2 submits that in view of the settlement and reunion, she does not wish to proceed with the criminal case in FIR in Crime No. 158/2026 dated 09 04 2026 came to be registered by Bagalagunte Police Station for the offences punishable under Sections 115(2), 118(1), 351(2), 3(5) and 352 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 against the Petitioners any further, and she has no objection if the said FIR and all further proceedings arising therefrom are quashed by this Hon'ble Court. 5. The parties state that the dispute is purely matrimonial and personal in nature, and in view of the compromise, continuation of criminal proceedings would serve no useful purpose and would amount to abuse of the process of law. The parties therefore jointly pray that this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to: Quash the FIR in Crime No. 158/2026 dated 09 04 2026 came to be registered by Bagalagunte Police Station for the offences punishable under Sections 115(2), 118(1), 351(2), 3(5) and 352 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, and all further proceedings arising therefrom, insofar as the Petitioners are concerned; and Pass such other order or orders as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit in the facts and circumstances of the case, in the interest of justice and equity.” 4.1. The joint memo filed in Crl.P.No.7538/2026, reads as follows: “1. The above Criminal Petition has been filed by the Petitioners seeking quashing of FIR in Crime No. 0052/2026 - 8 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:29841 CRL.P No. 7537 of 2026 C/W CRL.P No. 7538 of 2026 registered by North Women Police Station, Bengaluru, for the offences punishable under Sections 85, 115(2), 351(2), 352 read with 35 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961, now pending before the 32nd Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Bengaluru. 2. Due to matrimonial differences between Petitioner No.1 - Sri. Bhuvan S and Respondent No.2 - Smt. Vidya C certain disputes arose, which led to filing of the said complaint and registration of the above FIR. 3. With the intervention of elders, relatives and well wishers, the parties have amicably resolved all their disputes. Petitioner No.1 and Respondent No.2 have decided to continue their marital relationship and live together as husband and wife in a separate, independent residence, away from other family members. It is agreed between the parties that: a) Petitioner No.1 and Respondent No.2 shall reside together in a separate residence of their choice; b) The family members of both sides, including Petitioner No.2 (mother) and Petitioner No.3 (sister), as well as the parents and brother of Respondent No.2, shall not interfere in the day to day matrimonial life and domestic affairs of the couple; Respondent No.2 submits that in view of the settlement and reunion, she does not wish to proceed with the criminal case in Crime No. 0052/2026 against the Petitioners any further, and she has no objection if the said FIR and all further proceedings arising therefrom are quashed by this Hon'ble Court. The parties state that the dispute is purely matrimonial and personal in nature, and in view of the compromise, continuation of criminal proceedings would serve no useful purpose and would amount to abuse of the process of law. The parties therefore jointly pray that this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to: - 9 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:29841 CRL.P No. 7537 of 2026 C/W CRL.P No. 7538 of 2026 Quash the FIR in Crime No. 0052/2026 of North Women Police Station, Bengaluru, and all further proceedings arising therefrom, insofar as the Petitioners are concerned; and Pass such other order or orders as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit in the facts and circumstances of the case, in the interest of justice and equity.” In the light of the afore-quoted joint memos, being a matrimonial dispute and the couple have reunited and living together happily, I deem it appropriate to terminate the proceedings against the petitioners in both the petitions. 5. For the aforesaid reasons, I pass the following: ORDER (i) The criminal petitions are disposed. (ii) The impugned Crime No.158/2026, pending before the XXXI Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bengaluru City, in Crl.P.No.7537/2026 and the impugned Crime No.52/2026, pending before the XXXII Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Bengaluru City, in Crl.P.No.7538/2026, stand quashed. Pending I.A.s’ in both the petitions, stand disposed, as a consequence. Sd/- (M.NAGAPRASANNA) JUDGE NVJ List No.: 2 Sl No.: 86