( 2026:JHHC:25571 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 6608 of 2026 Sandip Murmu son of Sushil Murmu … … Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand … … Opp. Party --- CORAM :HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANUBHA RAWAT CHOUDHARY --- For the Petitioner : Mr. Gautam Kumar, Advocate For the Opp. Party : Mr. Azeemuddin, APP --- 07/24.08.2026 Heard the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the parties. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody in connection with Ranga P.S. Case No. 181 of 2025 (S.T. Case No. 81 of 2026) for the offences registered under Sections 64,89 of the B.N.S. 2023 pending in the court of learned Additional Sessions Judge-I-Cum-Spl. Court, C.A.W. Rajmahal. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody since 17.12.2025 and charge has been framed on 29.04.2026 for the alleged offence under Sections 69 and 89 of the BNS, 2023. The learned counsel submits that as per the FIR itself, the petitioner and the victim were in live in relationship for five years. The learned counsel submits that the petitioner may be enlarged on bail. 4. Learned counsel for the opposite party-State has opposed the prayer for bail and has submitted that there is direct allegation against the petitioner and it has come during investigation that the victim has also supported to abortion. The learned counsel submits that notice was served upon the victim but she has not entered appearance. 5. After hearing the learned counsel for the parties and considering the FIR itself which reveals that the petitioner and the victim were in live in relationship for 05 years and charge has already been framed, the petitioner above named is directed to be enlarged on bail on his furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rs. Twenty-five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Sessions Judge-I-Cum-Spl. Court, C.A.W. ( 2026:JHHC:25571 ) 2 Rajmahal, in connection with Ranga P.S. Case No. 181 of 2025 (S.T. Case No. 81 of 2026), on the following conditions: (i) One of the bailors would be the present pairvikar of the petitioner. (ii) The other bailor should be his close relative. (iii) The petitioner will attend the court on each and every date and on account of his single default, the learned court shall cancel the bail bond furnished by the petitioner. (iv) The petitioner will deposit a self-attested copy of his Aadhar Card along with his mobile number before the learned court which he will not change during the pendency of the case without prior permission of the court. (v) The petitioner shall fully co-operate with the proceedings before the learned court below. 6. Let this order along with a copy of the affidavit filed with the bail petition be communicated to the court concerned through FAX/e- mail. 7. The instant bail application is allowed with the aforesaid conditions. (Anubha Rawat Choudhary, J.) Dated: 24.08.2026 Uploaded on 25.08.2026 Binit/