APHC010462372023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3330] FRIDAY,THE TWENTY SEVENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 24115/2023 Between: 1. K DHANA BAGYAMMA, W/O NAGABHUSHANAM REDDY, AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS, R/O D.NO.6-111, VEPAMANU VEEDHI, TIRUCHANURU, TIRUPATI RURAL MANDAL, TIRUPATI DISTRICT ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP., BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI CAPITAL CITY, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, , TIRUPATI DISTRICT, TIRUPATI. 3. THE JOINT COLLECTOR, , TIRUPATI DISTRICT, TIRUPATI. 4. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, , TIRUPATI, TIRUPATI DISTRICT. 5. THE TAHSILDAR, TIURPATI RURAL MANDAL, TIRUPATI, TIRUPATI DISTRICT. 6. G GANGI REDDY, S/O VENKATESH REDDY, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, R/O H.NO.8-51, SANAJAMA VEEDHI, TIRUCHANURU VILLAGE, TIRUPATI RURAL MANDALAM, TIRUPATI DISTRICT ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased tomay be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction more particularly in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondents 4 and 5 in interfering with the possession and enjoyment and also trying to dispossess the petitioner from the land in Sy.No.156/4 to an extent of Ac.2-22 Cts and in Sy.No.156/5 to an extent of Ac.0.30 Cts in Tiruchanuru Village, Tirupati Rural Mandal, Tirupati District, without issuing any notice and without following due process of law, at the instance of the 6th Respondent and that too when Form 6A application dated 28-10-2022 is pending with the 5th Respondent, as arbitrary, illegal, for extraneous considerations, and in violation of Article 14, 21 and 300A of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the Respondents not to interfere and not to dispossess the petitioner without following due 2 process of law with regard to the land in Sy.No.156/4 to an extent of Ac.2-22 Cts and in Sy.No.156/5 to an extent of Ac.0.30 Cts in Tiruchanuru Village, Tirupati Rural Mandal, Tirupati District, and to pass such IA NO: 1 OF 2023 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be pleasedto direct the Respondents not to interfere and not to dispossess the petitioner without following due process of law with regard to the land in Sy.No.156/4 to an extent of Ac.2-22 Cts and in Sy.No.156/5 to an extent of Ac.0.30 Cts in Tiruchanuru Village, Tirupati Rural Mandal, Tirupati District, pending disposal of the above writ petition and to pass such IA NO: 1 OF 2026 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased May be pleased to vacate the interim order dated 14.09.2023 in WP.No.24115 of 2023 and dismiss the writ petition and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. SUBBA RAO KORRAPATI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following: 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION No.24115 of 2023 ORDER:- The present Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking the following relief: “…to issue an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction more particularly in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents 4 and 5 in interfering with the possession and enjoyment and also trying to dispossess the petitioner from the land in Sy.No.156/4 to an extent of Ac.2.22 cents and in Sy.No.156/5 to an extent of Ac.0.30 cents in Tiruchanuru Village, Tirupati Rural Mandal, Tirupati District, without issuing any notice and without following due process of law, at the instance of the 6th respondent and that too when Form 6A application dated 28.10.2022 is pending with the 5th respondent, as arbitrary, illegal, for extraneous considerations, and in violation of Article 14, 21 and 300A of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents not to interfere and not to dispossess the petitioner without following due process of law with regard to the land in Sy.No.156/4 to an extent of Ac.2.22 cents and in Sy.No.156/5 to an extent of Ac.0.30 cents in Tiruchanuru Village, Tirupati Rural Mandal, Tirupati District, and to pass.…” 2. Heard Sri Subba Rao Korrapati, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Assistant Government Pleader for respondents. 3. Pithily, the writ petition is filed to direct the respondents not to interfere and dispossess the petitioner, without following the due process of law, with regard to the land in Sy.No.156/4 to an extent of Ac.2.22 cents and in Sy.No.156/5 to an extent of Ac.0.30 cents situated at Tiruchanuru Village, Tirupati Rural Mandal, Tirupati District and for other directions. 4 4. The 5th respondent filed counter, wherein, it is asserted that neither the 5th respondent nor his staff is interfering with the petitioner’s possession over the subject land of the writ petition. 5. In view of the same, the present Writ Petition is disposed of, if at all the respondent authorities are intended to interfere with the possession of the petitioner’s property and if the respondents found that the petitioner is not the owner of the property, the respondents shall follow the due procedure as established under law. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________________________ JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO Date: 27.02.2026 SCH 5 196 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION No.24115 of 2023 Date: 27.02.2026 SCH