IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No.8811 of 2026 Date of Decision: 22.9.2026 _____________________________________________________________________ Akshay Kumar ……...Petitioner Versus Shri Jawalamukhi Temple Trust and Ors. …....Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting? For the Petitioner: Mr. Abhinav Mohan Goel, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. Deepak Sharma, Advocate, for respondent No.1. Mr. Rajan Kahol & Mr. Vishal Panwar, Additional Advocates General and Mr. Ravi Chauhan & Mr. Anish Banshtu, Deputy Advocates General, for the State. __________________________________________________________________________ Sandeep Sharma, J. (Oral) While placing on record communication dated 14.9.2026 under the signature of Temple Officer, Temple Trust, Jawalamukhi, Mr. Deepak Sharma, Advocate, states that Temple Trust has no objection qua the inclusion of the name of the petitioner in the list of Baridars. He further states that once the Trust has decided to include the name of the petitioner in the list of Baridars, other pujaris cannot have any objection. Since the grievance of the petitioner stands redressed as has been recorded 2 hereinabove, nothing remains to be adjudicated in the present petition and the same is disposed of accordingly, along with pending applications, if any. September 22, 2026 (Sandeep Sharma), (manjit) Judge