Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 23924 (AP)

SAMMETA TULASI RAO v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

WP/23792/2023 · 2026-02-05

Tarlada Rajasekhar Rao

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010462082023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3330] FRIDAY,THE SIXTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 23792/2023 Between: 1. SAMMETA TULASI RAO, S/O. NARAYANA RAO, HINDU, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, OCC. CULTIVATION, RIO. MUKKOLLU (V), GUDURU (M), KRISHNA DISTRICT ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT AT VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, KRISHNA DISTRICT, MACHILIPATNAM, 3. REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, , MACHILIPATNAM, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 4. THE TAHSILDHAR, KRUTHHIVENNU MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 5. MUKKOLLU GRAMA PANCHAYAT, REP BY ITS PANCHAYAT SECRETARY, MUKKOLLU (V), GUDUR (M), KRISHNA DISRTICT ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue a Writ or order more particularly one in the nature 2 of writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ declare the action of the respondents in purporting to disposes the petitioner from the agriculture land in an extent of Ac. 2.52 cents situated in Sy.No. 241/7 and Sy.No. 240/3 of in Mukkollu village, Guduru Mandal, Krishna District, without issuing any notice or following the procedure contemplated under law and to declare the same as illegal, arbitrary, unjust, discriminatory and also in violation of the principles of natural justice apart from violation of fundamental right of right to property guaranteed under Article 300-A of constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents to follow the procedure contemplated under law and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2023 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the respondents not to dispossess the petitioner from the agriculture land in an extent of Ac. 2.52 cents situated in Sy.No. 241/7 and Sy.No. 240/3 of in Mukkollu village, Guduru Mandal, Krishna District in the interest of justice and to pass such Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. MADHU SUDANA SAI RAM ASADI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following: 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION No.23792 OF 2023 ORDER: Learned counsel for the petitioner sought permission of this Court to withdraw the writ petition. Learned counsel endorsed the same on the bundle. Permission is accorded. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________________ JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO Date: 06.02.2026 KBN 4 14 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION No.23792 of 2023 Date: 06.02.2026 KBN