Vakamullu Jayarama Siva Prasad v. The Executive Engineer
WP/21533/2018 · 2026-02-25
Sumathi Jagadam
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 23920 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 23920 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010460112018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3459] THURSDAY,THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 21533/2018 Between:
1. VAKAMULLU JAYARAMA SIVA PRASAD,, S/O SITARAM, AGED 43 YEARS, OCCU. CULATIVATION RIO KAMESWARI PETA VILLAGE, NARASANNAPETA MANDALAM, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND
1. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, ROADS AND BUILDING DEPARTMENT, NARASANNAPETA DIVISION, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT ENGINEER, ROADS AND BUILDING DEPARTMENT, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. 3. THE ENGINEER IN CHIEF ROADS AND BUILDINGS, ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE AT D. NO.7404, SRI ANJANEYA TOWERS, A-BLOCK, 5TH FLOOR, N.T.R.T.P.S. ROAD, IBRAHIMPATNAM ANDHRA PRADESH-521456. 4. THE STATE OF AP, REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, ROAD AND BUILDINGS DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR. ANDHRA PRADESH. 5. THE ANDHRA PRADESH ROAD DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION A P R D C, REP BY ITS EX-OFFICIO CHAIRMAN, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S):
2 JS,J W.P.No.21533/2018
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue a Writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in laying the road in Sy No. 48-10 in an extent of Ac. 1-82 cents of land, in Sy No. 45-4 in an extent of Ac. 1-15 cents of land, in Sy No.45-6 in an extent of Act-00 cents of land, in Sy No. 45-6A in an extent of Ac. 2-66 cents of land situated at Lukalam Village of Narasannapeta Mandal of Srikakulam District of the petitioner and his family members without following due procedure of law is arbitrary, illegal,) oppressive and violation of principles 6f natural justice and it is opposed to Art 300-A of the Constitution of India consequently direct the respondents not to take any coercive steps of disposition without following a due procedure of law and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2018 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents not to take any coercive steps like disposition the petitioner and his family members from the land in Sy No: 48-10 in an extent of Ac, 1-82 cents of land, in Sy No: 45-4 in an extent of Ac.
1-15 cents of land, in Sy No:45-6 in an extent of Ac1-00 cents of land, in Sy No: 45-6A in an extent of Ac. 2-66 cents of land situated at Lukalam Village of Narasannapeta Mandal of Srikakulam District for the purpose of laying a road pending disposal of the writ petition and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. ELEVATED AS JUDGE Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR ROADS BUILDINGS (AP)
3 JS,J W.P.No.21533/2018
The Court made the following ORDER:
Sri.T.Ramji Varma, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner sought permission of this Court to withdraw the present writ petition. Permission is accorded. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________________ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM Dated: 26.02.2026
RSD
4 JS,J W.P.No.21533/2018
3 THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM
WRIT PETITION NO: 21533/2018
Dated: 26.02.2026
RSD