Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2026:JHHC:2582
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
ABA No.6007 of 2025
Sohail Ansari, aged about 18 years, son of Saharauddin, resident of Village Mattar, P.O. and P.S. Karmatar, District Jamtara, Jharkhand.
…. Petitioner
Versus The State of Jharkhand
… Opp. Party
--------
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI
------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Arvind Kr. Choudhary, Advocate For the State
: Mr. Shailendra Kr. Tiwari, Spl. P.P. ------
2/02.02.2026 Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of Petitioner and
learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State.
2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Jamtara Cyber Crime P.S. Case No. 55 of 2025, registered for the offence under Sections 111(2)(b), 317(2), 317(5), 318(4), 319(2), 336(3), 338, 340(2) & 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, Section 66(B) (C) (D) of the Information Technology Act and Section 42(3)(e) of Telecommunication Act, pending in the Court of the learned Special Judge, Cyber Crime, Jamtara.
3.
Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case and the name of the petitioner has come in the confessional statement. He further submits that the apprehended co-accused have been granted regular bail. He next submits that the petitioner has got no criminal antecedent as disclosed in para 10 of the petition.
4.
Learned counsel appearing for the State has opposed the prayer and submit that the name of the petitioner has come on the confessional statement.
2026:JHHC:2582
2
5. Considering that the name of the petitioner has come on the confessional statement, the apprehended co-accused have already been granted regular bail and the petitioner has got no criminal antecedent as disclosed in para 10 of the petition, in that view of the matter, the petitioner is directed to appear before the learned Court within two weeks and the learned court shall release the petitioner on such terms and conditions and sureties, the learned court may deem fit and proper.
6. This Anticipatory Bail Application is accordingly disposed of.
(Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.) 02.02.2026 R.Kumar