Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 23910 (KAR)

M/S GKB HI-TECH PRIVATE LTD., v. M/S SUNIL MEHTA MARKETING PVT LTD.,

RFA/1655/2019 · 2026-07-02

Anu Sivaraman, Venkatesh Naik T

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

. - 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:7962-DB R.F.A. No.1655/2019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 10TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2026 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO.1655/2019 (EJE) BETWEEN: M/S. GKB HI-TECH PRIVATE LTD., NO.81/A, YESHWANTPUR INDUSTRIAL AREA, 2ND STAGE BENGALURU-560022 REP. BY ITS DIRECTOR MR. NEERAJ GUPTA S/O MR. MAHENDRA KUMAR GUPTA AND ALSO HAVING OFFICE AT NO.50 TIVIM INDUSTRIAL ESTATE BARDEZ, GOA. …APPELLANT (BY SMT. SUKRUTHA, ADV., FOR SMT. ANNAPOORNA S, ADV.,) AND: M/S SUNIL MEHTA MARKETING PVT. LTD., REPRESENTED BY ITS DIRECTOR SRI. SUNIL MEHTA S/O GAUTHAM RAJ MEHTA AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS Digitally signed by RUPA V HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA . - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:7962-DB R.F.A. No.1655/2019 RESIDING AT NO.81 A, YESHWANTHAPURA INDUSTRIAL ARE 2ND STAGE BANGALORE-560022. …RESPONDENT (BY SMT. MAINA VARMA & SMT. ASHA VARMA, ADVS.,) THIS RFA IS FILED UNDER SEC.96 R/W ORDER 41 RULE 1 OF CPC., 1908, PRAYING TO CALL FOR THE REOCRDS IN O.S.NO.5418/2016 ON THE FILE OF THE HON'BLE LVI ADDL. CITY CIVIL & SESSIONS JUDGE, BANGALORE CCH-57 PERUSE THE SAME AND SET ASIDE THE JUDGMENT AND DDECREE DATED 05.10.2018 & ETC., THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN and HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL . - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:7962-DB R.F.A. No.1655/2019 ORAL JUDGMENT (PER: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL) Smt.Sukrutha, learned counsel submits that she represent learned counsel Sri.Anjan Dev N., and his colleague Smt.Annapoorna S., learned counsel had filed vakalath. She further states that Smt.Annapoorna S., learned counsel has informed her over phone that she has given No Objection to the appellant. As learned counsel is retired from the case and it appears that the appellant is not interest in prosecuting the case. Hence, the appeal is dismissed for non prosecution. Sd/- (ANU SIVARAMAN) JUDGE Sd/- (VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL) JUDGE BSR List No.: 1 Sl No.: 1