Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2026:HHC:8819 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
COPC No.113 of 2026
Decided on : 24.03.2026
Ram Lal Sharma ...Petitioner. Versus
Bhupender Kumar Attri
…..Respondent. Coram The Hon'ble Mr. Justice Romesh Verma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioner: Mr. Neeraj Gupta, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Pranjal Munjal, Advocate. For the respondent: Mr. Mukul Sood, Advocate. Romesh Verma, Judge (oral)
Learned Counsel submits that he is under instructions not to press the present petition. He further submits that on account of arrangement, which was entered between the parties in LPA No.132 of 2026, in case, any of the grievances, remains unaddressed by the respondent, then, he may be given liberty to revive the present petition. His statement is taken on record. In view of above, the instant petition is closed as not pressed with liberty to the petitioner as aforesaid.
Pending miscellaneous application (s), if any, also stand
disposed off. (Romesh Verma)
Judge March 24, 2026 (meera) 1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment?