Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010191992026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3330] WEDNESDAY,THE SIXTH DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 9739/2026 Between:
1. NAIK KUMARA,, S/O. SRI DARGYA NAIK, AGED 47 YEARS, WORKING AS CHIEF MANAGER, EC NO.162085, BANK OF BARODA, MACHILIPATNAM BRANCH, VIJAYAWADA REGION, KRISHNA DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND
1. UNION OF INDIA, REP BY ITS SECRETARY, FINANCE DEPARTMENT, SASTRY BHAVAN, NEW DELHI - 110001. 2. GENERAL MANAGER ZH, ZONAL. OFFICE, D.NO.3-6-289,1ST FLOOR,
KAREEM MANZIL, OLD MLA QUARTERS ROAD,HYDERABAD, TELANGANA STATE,500029. 3. THE CHIEF MANAGER AND IA, BANK OF BARODA, CHITTOOR BRANCH, TIRUPATI REGION - 517002.
...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased tomay be pleased to issue a Writ, Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, the present writ petition is filed by the petitioners, declaring the action of the 3rd respondent in trying to conduct the enquiry against the petitioner basing on the instructions of the
2
2nd respondent basing on the complaint made by the exwife of the petitioners without considering the services of the petitioner rendering from 30.11.2009 into the respondent bank due to which the carrier of the petitioner will be spoiled is illegal, arbitrary and against the principles of natural justice and also violative of Articles 14, 19 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents not to initiate any enquiry proceedings against the petitioner and pass such IA NO: 1 OF 2026 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be pleased to grant STAY of the enquiry proceedings conducting by the 3rd respondent against the petitioner pending disposal of the above writ petition and to pass such IA NO: 2 OF 2026 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased May be pleased to permit the petitioner to Implead the Smt. P.Jayalakshmi, Kogali Tanda, Kogali Post, Hagari Bommanahalli Taluk, Vijayanagar District, Karnataka State as a Respondents No. 4 in the above Writ petition No. 9739 of 2026 and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. RIZWAN ALI SHAIK Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. The Court made the following:
3
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION No.9739 OF 2026
ORDER:
Sri Ravula Nagarjuna, learned counsel, representing learned counsel for the petitioner, sought permission of this Court to withdraw the writ petition.
Learned counsel endorsed the same on the bundle.
Permission is accorded.
Accordingly, the present Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed.
__________________________________ JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO Date: 06.05.2026
KBN
4
05 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO
WRIT PETITION No.9739 of 2026 Date: 06.05.2026
KBN