Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 23909 (AP)

K.Madhusudhan Rao v. Sri N,Pramod Kumar

CC/1764/2013 · 2026-03-30

Gannamaneni Ramakrishna Prasad

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010463162013 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3328] TUESDAY,THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD CONTEMPT CASE NO: 1764/2013 Between: 1. K.MADHUSUDHAN RAO, S/O.MUNICHANDER, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, OCC: BUSINESS, R/O.D.NO.6-16, BANTUMILLI ROAD, KUMMARUCHERUVU VEEDHI, GUDIVADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. SRI N PRAMOD KUMAR, COMMISSIONER, GUDIVADA MUNICIPALITY, GUDIVADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 2. DR BUDDHAPRAKASH M JYOTHI, DISTRICT COLLECTOR, KRISHNA DISTRICT AT MACHILIPATNAM. 3. SRI S VENKATA SUBBAIAH, REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, GUDIVADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 4. SRI T DEVADAS, TAHSILDAR, GUDIVADA MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 5. PEDDABOYINA SUBBA RAO, S/O.VENKATESWARA RAO, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, R/O.BANTUMILLI ROAD, OPP.PETROL BUNK, NAKKALAKODU BUND, GUDIVADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 6. PEDDABOYINA HARI, S/O.SUBBA RAO, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, R/O.BANTUMILLI ROAD, OPP.PETROL BUNK, NAKKALAKODU BUND, GUDIVADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 7. PEDDABOYINA RAMESH, S/O.SUBBA RAO, AGED ABOUT 3 2 YEARS, R/O.BANTUMILLI ROAD, OPP.PETROL BUNK, NAKKALAKODU BUND, GUDIVADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT. ...CONTEMNOR(S): Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to pleased to summon and punish respondents for having acted willfully and in disobedience of the orders passed by this Hon'ble Court in WPMP No.29785 of 2013 in WP No.24202 of 2013 dt.20.08.2013 u/Secs.10 to 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. P KASI NAGESWARA RAO Counsel for the Contemnor(S): 1. B D MAHESWARA REDDY 2. GP FOR REVENUE 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD CONTEMPT CASE NO: 1764 OF 2013 The Court made the following ORAL ORDER: This Contempt Case is filed complaining of violation of the Interim Order passed by this Court dated 20.08.2013 in W.P.M.P.No.29785 of 2013 in W.P.No.24202 of 2013. 2. It transpires from the record that during the pendency of the Contempt Case, the main Writ Petition No.24202 of 2013 itself has been disposed of with directions, vide Order dated 20.02.2023, which is on record. The Final Order passed by this Court dated 20.02.2023 is taken on record. 3. Having taken note of the same, this Court is of the view that this Contempt Case has become infructuous. 4. Accordingly, this Contempt Case is closed. No order as to costs. 5. Interlocutory Applications, if any, stand closed in terms of this order. ______________________________________ GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD, J Date: 31.03.2026 MNR 4 HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD CONTEMPT CASE NO: 1764 OF 2013 Dt: 31.03.2026 Mnr