( 2026:JHHC:25474 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.7878 of 2026 ------ Rezaul Ansari @ Razooullah, aged about 21 years, son of Late Rizwan Ansari, resident of Kundru Khurd, P.O. & P.S.-Rajrappa, District-Ramgarh, Jharkhand. .... .... …. Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand .... .... .... Opposite Party ------ CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Aman Ali, Advocate For the State : Mr. Sanat Kr. Jha, Addl.P.P ------ Order No.02 Dated- 24-08-2026 Heard the parties. The petitioner has moved this Court for grant of bail in connection with Rajrappa P.S. Case No.68 of 2026 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 126(2), 117(2), 109(1), 309(6) & 3 (5) of the B.N.S., 2023. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner attempted to commit murder of Jai Kishun Munda and committed robbery by looting Rs.4 lakhs which he kept tied in his dhoti. It is next submitted that the allegations against the petitioner are all false. It is also submitted that the money has been recovered from the co-accused person. It is further submitted that the petitioner undertakes to cooperate with the trial of the case and further undertakes that he will not annoy or disturb the informant/victim or the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. It is also submitted that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent as has been mentioned in para-16 of this bail application. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 26.05.2026 as has been mentioned in para-15 of this bail application. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be admitted to bail. Learned Addl. P.P. appearing for the State on the other hand vehemently opposes the prayer for bail and submits that keeping in view the direct allegation of serious nature against the petitioner of attempted to commit murder and looting Rs.4 lakhs, there is every chance of the petitioner absconding and tampering with evidence, if released on bail. It is therefore submitted that the petitioner ought not be released on bail. Considering the serious nature of allegation against the petitioner as well as the chance of the petitioner absconding and tampering with evidence, if released on bail, this Court is not inclined to admit the petitioner on bail. Accordingly, the prayer for bail of the above-named petitioner is rejected. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) 24/08/2026 Abhiraj/