1 APHC010459582005 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI THURSDAY, THE TWELFTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE V SRINIVAS SECOND APPEAL NO: 533 OF 2005 Between: 1. Vangala Bushi Reddy, S/o. N.Subba Reddy R/o. Thatipadu Village, Jupadu Bungalow Mandal, Kurnool District. ...Petitioner AND 1. Pedda Bichanna, S/o. Sayanna R/o. Prathakota East (V), Pagidyala Mandal, Kurnool District. 2. Chinna Bichanna, S/o. Sayanna now working as E.O.,Gram Panchayath Manthralayam, Kurnool District. 3. Mallaiah, S/o. Pedda Bichanna R/o. Prathakota East (V), Pagidyala Mandal, Kurnool District. ...Respondents Appeal under Section 100 of C.P.C. against the Decree and Judgment dated 28.02.2005 made in A.S.No.20 of 2000 on the file of the Senior Civil Judge, Nandikotkur, reversing the judgment dated 28.09.2000 in O.S.No.70 of 1995 on the file of Principal Junior Civil Judge, Nandikotkur. 2 IA NO: 1 OF 2005(SAMP 1115 OF 2005 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pending SA the respondents herein be restrain from interfering with my possession over the suit schedule property in an extent of 3.82 cents in Sy.No.91,91/2 and 150 of Lakshmapuram Village, Kurnool District. IA NO: 1 OF 2017(SAMP 1883 OF 2017 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased fix an early date of hearing of SA No.533/2005. Counsel for the Petitioner: ELEVATED AS JUDGE Counsel for the Respondents: N SIVA REDDY The Court made the following: 3 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V.SRINIVAS SECOND APPEAL No.533 of 2005 JUDGMENT: On 07.01.2026, this Court permitted the learned counsel for respondents to take out personal notice to the appellant and submit a compliance report. Pursuant thereto, learned counsel for respondents sent notice to the appellant and filed proof of service. However, the notice was returned unserved with an endorsement ‘party left without instructions’. 2. In view of the above circumstances, the Second Appeal is dismissed for default. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________ JUSTICE V.SRINIVAS Date:12.02.2026 RMR 4 35 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V.SRINIVAS SECOND APPEAL No.533 of 2005 (Dismissed for default) Date: 12.02.2026 RMR