1 APHC010460852017 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3504] MONDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM WRIT PETITION NO: 20548/2017 Between: 1. AJMEERA VENKATADURGA CHIMNA NAIK, S/O.BADDIAH, AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS, OCC: UNEMPLOYEE, R/O.D.NO.20-98, SHANTI NAGAR, TIRUVURU MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH - 521 235. 2. A.CHANDRA SHEKAR, S/O. RAMA KRISHNAIAH, AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS, OCC: UNEMPLOYEE, R/O.D.NO.4-97, NTR COLONY, PATTOOR, KRISHNA DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 3. M.SHAILENDER KUMAR, S/O. LATE SATYA SRINIVASA RAO, AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS, OCC: UNEMPLOYEE, R/O.D.NO.10-87, NEAR POLICE STATION BACK SIDE, MUMIDIVARAM, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, PR & RD DEPARTMENT, VELGAPUDI SECRETARIAT, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER, SERP, T.T.D.C, MILURAI, GOLLAPUDI, VIJAYAWADA, ANDHRA PRADESH. 2 3. THE PROJECT DIRECTOR, DRDA, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT, ELURU, ANDHRA PRADESH. 4. THE PROJECT DIRECTOR, DRDA, NELLORE, ANDHRA PRADESH. 5. THE PROJECT DIRECTOR, DRDA, CHITTOOR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of MANDAMUS to declare the action of the respondents in not considering the claim of the petitioners to continue their services as Production Experts in view of the orders passed by 2nd respondent in Circular N FO:07/APSERP/ F.LH/ 2015 dated 21.09.2015 is illegal arbitrary and unconstitutional and with a consequential direction to the respondents to consider the claim of the petitioners to continue their services as Production Experts in view of the orders passed by 2nd respondent in Circular N FO:07/ APSERP/F.LH/ 2015 dated 21.09.2015 and pay the salaries due to them with all consequential benefits. IA NO: 1 OF 2017(WPMP 25186 OF 2017 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to consider the claim of the petitioners to continue their services as Production Experts in view of the orders passed by 2nd respondent in Circular FO:07/APSERP/F.LH/2015 dated 21.09.2015 and pay the salaries due to them forthwith along with others. Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. Ajmeera Venkatadurga Chimna Naik 2. K JOSEPH 3 Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. HARISH KUMAR RASINENI 2. M S R CHANDRA MURTHY 3. GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ & RURAL DEV (AP) The Court made the following: 4 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM WRIT PETITION NO: 20548 of 2017 ORDER:- The instant writ petition has been filed by the petitioners under Article 226 of Constitution of India seeking the following main prayer: “…..issue an order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of MANDAMUS to declare the action of the respondents in not considering the claim of the petitioners to continue their services as Production Experts in view of the orders passed by 2nd respondent in Circular N FO:07/APSERP/ F.LH/ 2015 dated 21.09.2015 is illegal arbitrary and unconstitutional and with a consequential direction to the respondents to consider the claim of the petitioners to continue their services as Production Experts in view of the orders passed by 2nd respondent in Circular N FO:07/ APSERP/F.LH/ 2015 dated 21.09.2015 and pay the salaries due to them with all consequential benefits...” 2. On 22.11.2022 there was no representation for the petitioners. The matter adjourned to 01.12.2022, 06.12.2022 and 08.05.2023. At last, on 11.03.2026 also no representation for the petitioners. Thus, the matter posted in the caption for dismissal. Later on, 18.03.2026 this Court passed the following order; “Sri M.Jaya Prakash, learned counsel representing Sri K.Joseph, learned counsel for the petitioner submit that Sri K.Joseph, learned counsel has given up his Vakalat long back. Hence, Registry is directed to print the name of petitioner/A.Venkata Durga Chimna Naik in the place of counsel for the petitioner. Post on 20.03.2026 in the very same caption „for dismissal‟.” 5 3. Consequently, today the matter is listed for dismissal. Unfortunately, today also there was no representation for the petitioners. Registry is also called the petitioners‟ names thrice, but none appeared. 4. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, all pending applications shall stand closed. ____________________________________ JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM Date: 23.03.2026 RMR 6 54 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM WRIT PETITION NO: 20548 of 2017 23.03.2026 W RMR