Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 23899 (CHH)

AVYANA SOLUTIONS PVT. LTD v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPC/3163/2026 · 2026-06-28

Shri Amitendra Kishore Prasad

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2026:CGHC:26256 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 3163 of 2026 Avyana Solutions Pvt. Ltd Through its Director, Ritik Agrawal, Age About 28 Years, S/o- Shri Gopal Kumar Agrawala, R/o- Sector-2, C-1/12, Devendra Nagar, Raipur, District- Raipur (C.G.) ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Its Secretary, Panchayat And Rural Development Department Mantralay, Mahanadi Bhavan, Nava Raipur, Atal Nagar, Raipur, District- Raipur (C.G.) 2 - Director, Panchayat Directorate, Vikas Bhavan, Sector-19, Nava Raipur, Atal Nagar, Raipur, District- Raipur (C.G.) 3 - Gram Panchayat Ichhapur-1, Through Its Sarpanch, Gram Panchayat Ichhapur- 1, Janpad Panchayat Bastar, District- Bastar (C.G.) 4 - Gram Panchayat Ichhapur-2 Through Its Sarpanch, Gram Panchayat Ichhapur- 2, Janpad Panchayat Bastar, District- Bastar (C.G.) 5 - Gram Panchayat Bagmohali-1, Through Its Sarpanch, Gram Panchayat Bagmohali-1, Janpad Panchayat Bastar, District- Bastar (C.G.) 6 - Gram Panchayat Bagmohali-2, Through Its Sarpanch, Gram Panchayat Bagmohali-2, Janpad Panchayat Bastar, District- Bastar (C.G.) SHYNA AJAY Digitally signed by SHYNA AJAY Date: 2026.07.01 11:09:32 +0530 2 7 - Gram Panchayat Sitlawand, Through Its Sarpanch, Gram Panchayat Sitlawand, Janpad Panchayat Bastar, District- Bastar (C.G.) 8 - Gram Panchayat Piplawand, Through Its Sarpanch, Gram Panchayat, Piplawand, Janpad Panchayat Bastar, District- Bastar (C.G.) 9 - Gram Panchayat Retawand, Through Its Sarpanch, Gram Panchayat Retawand, Janpad Panchayat Bastar, District- Bastar (C.G.) 10 - Gram Panchayat Semalnar, Through its Sarpanch, Gram Panchayat Semalnar, Janpad Panchayat Bastar, District- Bastar (C.G.) 11 - Gram Panchayat Mavligura, Through Its Sarpanch, Gram Panchayat Mavligura, Janpad Panchayat Mavligura, District- Bastar (C.G.) 12 - Gram Panchayat Talur, Through Its Sarpanch, Gram Panchayat Talur, Janpad Panchayat Talur, District- Bastar (C.G.) ... Respondent(s) (Cause Title downloaded from CIS Periphery) For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Yogesh Pandey, Advocate For Respondent(s) : Mr. Shobhit Mishra, Dy. GA S B: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad Order on Board 29/06/2026 1. By way of this petition, the petitioner seeks the following reliefs : 1) To issue appropriate writ, order, direction to the respondent No. 2 to allocate funds of total 91,08,000/- to the Gram Panchayat and thereafter directing the respondents to pay total Rs 91,08,000/- the petitioner in the interest of justice. 3 2) To call for the entire original records from the office of the Respondents for kind perusal of the Hon'ble Court. To issue any other writ, order or direction which the Hon'ble Court deems fit in the interest of justice. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner-Firm installed 20 solar lights in each of the different Gram Panchayats, however, the requisite amount has not yet been disbursed. He submits that this delay is on the ground that funds have not been allocated to the concerned Gram Panchayat by Respondent No.2- Director, Panchayat Directorate, Atal Nagar, Raipur. He further submits that the petitioner has already filed a representation dated 11.5.2026 in this regard before Respondent No.2, which is still pending consideration. 3. At this stage, learned counsel for the petitioner makes a limited prayer to dispose of this petition with a direction to the concerned authority – Respondent No.2 to decide the said representation expeditiously. 4. The aforesaid prayer is not opposed by the other side. 5. Heard learned counsel for the parties and also perused the documents annexed with the petition carefully. 6. Considering the aforesaid aspects of the case, without entering into the merits of the case, and further considering the limited prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioner, this Petition is disposed with a direction to the concerned authority – Respondent No.2 to decide the aforesaid representation filed by the petitioner 4 expeditiously. 7. However, it is made clear that if any complaint is received against the petitioner alleging that the claimed number of solar lights has not been installed, the concerned authority shall be at liberty to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law. 8. With the aforesaid observation/direction, the Petition is disposed of. Sd/- (Amitendra Kishore Prasad) Judge Shyna Ajay