IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.42456 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-22 Year-2025 Thana- RUDRAPUR District- Madhubani ====================================================== Md. Aashik S/O Md. Mojibur Rahman Resident of Village- Harna,Ward no. 11, PO-Harna,PS- Rudrapur, District- Madhunbani, Bihar-847404 ... ... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State of Bihar 2. Shahjadi Khatoon W/O Shamse Alam Resident of Village- Harna,PS- Rudrapur, District- Madhunbani, Bihar-847404 ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Rajkumar Rajesh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Ram Anurag Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER 2 09-07-2026 Heard the parties. 2. This is the second attempt of the petitioner for grant of regular bail in connection with Rudrapur P.S. Case No. 22 of 2025 registered for the offence under Sections 118(1), 70(1), 126(2), 115(2), 351(2), 351(3) of the BNS and under Section 4 of the POCSO Act. Earlier the bail application of the petitioner was rejected vide order dated 03.12.2025 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 81298 of 2025 which reads as under:- Heard the parties. 2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Rudrapur P.S. Case No. 22 of 2025 registered for the offence under Sections 118(1), 70(1), 126(2), 115(2), 351(2), 351(3) of the BNS and under Section 4 of the POCSO Act. Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.42456 of 2026(2) dt.09-07-2026 2/2 3. As per the prosecution case, the petitioner has brutally committed rape with the victim. 4. The petitioner is in custody since 15.07.2025. 5. Considering the serious allegation levelled against the petitioner, this Court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. 6. Accordingly, this application stands dismissed. 3. It has been submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the trial is progressing and five out of six witnesses have been examined. 4. Considering the aforesaid facts, this Court finds no ground to review its earlier order. 5. Accordingly, this application is dismissed again. tusharika/- (Sandeep Kumar, J) U T